Search for: "Montana Supreme Court"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 3,900
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2016, 2:30 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: CIVIL – POSTCONVICTION DA 15-0291, 2016 MT 5N, JAMES PATRICK BRANDENBURG, Petitioner and Appellant, v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 2:27 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: CRIMINAL – ENDANGERMENT-CRIMINAL DA 14-0568, 2016 MT 4N, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 2:24 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: CIVIL – WRIT OF MANDAMUS DA 15-0467, 2016 MT 3N, SHAWN GUYMON, Petitioner and Appellant, v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 2:21 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: CIVIL – DEPENDENT NEGLECT DA 15-0386, 2016 MT 2, IN THE MATTER OF: C.W.E. and C.M.E., Youths in Need of Care. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 2:17 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: CRIMINAL – HOMICIDE-DELIBERATE DA 13-0623, 2016 MT 1, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 12:31 pm
A significant blow to their treasuries could come if non-union workers are able to turn broad hints by the Supreme Court into final victory in Friedrichs v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 11:35 am
In sum, the Fifth Circuit followed the Supreme Court’s guidance in Casey and Gonzales to the letter — and it is the petitioners that advocate turning the Court’s abortion jurisprudence on its head. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 6:48 am
Few things confound the Supreme Court more than Indian law, but the Justices keep wading into a relatively steady stream of cases. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 8:43 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: CIVIL – WATER RIGHTS ADJUDICATION DA 15-0370, 2015 MT 353, IN RE THE CROW WATER COMPACT, IN THE MATTER OF THE ADJUDICATION OF EXISTING AND RESERVED RIGHTS TO THE USE OF WATER, BOTH SURFACE AND UNDERGROUND, OF THE CROW TRIBE OF INDIANS OF THE STATE OF MONTANA [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 12:40 pm
For those unfamiliar with Supreme Court practice, four cases in one term is a lot. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 5:19 pm
The Supreme Court will decide. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 10:00 am
Nov. 10, 2015), the Montana Supreme Court answered a certified question from the federal Bankruptcy Court by determining that under Montana’s exemption statute, Mont. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
City of Chicago in 2010 – a trend that some Supreme Court ignorati suspected might doom this case. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 6:59 am
Supreme Court has diminished the civil authority of Indian tribal governments over nonmembers within the tribes’ territories. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 9:48 am
More Blog Posts: State Supreme Court Reverses Plaintiff’s Award for Punitive Damages, Maryland Car Accident Attorney Blog, published October 7, 2015. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 7:22 pm
Goldstein’s answer focused on how the Article III courts provide citizens with more, and frankly required, due process than tribal courts with the option of removal or seeking ultimate review to the Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 11:48 am
Until the Supreme Court weighs in on the split between the Circuits, employers located in those states covered by the Ninth Circuit – Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon and Washington – will need to ensure that employees are provided a “completely relieved from duty” meal period, or risk being in violation of the FLSA. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 11:48 am
Until the Supreme Court weighs in on the split between the Circuits, employers located in those states covered by the Ninth Circuit – Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon and Washington – will need to ensure that employees are provided a “completely relieved from duty” meal period, or risk being in violation of the FLSA. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 3:55 am
For the first time, I attended an argument live at the Supreme Court. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:20 pm
Natelson retired a few years ago from the University of Montana School of Law and is now senior fellow in constitutional jurisprudence at the Independence Institute; he has written extensively on constitutional history, and his work has been cited in five Supreme Court cases since 2013. [read post]
