Search for: "Nixon v. Nixon"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 1,572
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2021, 5:05 am
The Court confronted this directly in Hill v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm
In 1970, (Republican) President Nixon signed Title X into law, which led to the creation of federally funded family-planning clinics across the country. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 4:36 am
Phelps, Brown v. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
Black and Douglas were, I was certain, fighting the good fight, as clearly evidenced in the Pentagon Papers case and their opposition to Richard Nixon and his associates. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 7:48 am
I am haunted by the fact that my loss in Lockyer v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 11:19 am
Nixon precedent); the Court may fashion a slightly longer schedule. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 4:15 pm
That decision, Crawford v. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 9:03 pm
Last year, President Trump responded angrily to the Supreme Court’s decision in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 1:05 pm
In 2016, Swarns served as lead counsel for Buck, arguing Buck v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
In Train v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm
As compared to earlier affirmative action cases, relatively little is really at stake in Fisher v. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 4:31 pm
Kennedy and Nixon were far too busy debating foreign policy issues (such as the "missile gap"), which tended to overwhelm everything else. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 9:14 am
Tatum case in 1973, a year after he had testified before Congress in defense of the surveillance practices at issue, as an Assistant Attorney General in the Nixon Administration, and continued through Rehnquist’s decision sit in the 2000 Microsoft case, potential conflicts among several justices in Bush v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 9:21 pm
Again, it is not for the White House to say "what the law is," as we all learned reading Marbury v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 6:45 pm
The modern era of tribal self-determination, running from the Nixon administration to the present, carries with it several imperatives that are implicated by this case. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:01 pm
The creation of that option might tempt the next Nixon or Kissinger seeking to cozy up to foreign dictators to slip them information about their dissidents. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
opan style='font:7.0pt "Times New Roman"'> SCOTUS docket hereRicci v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
The court-enforced Constitution fully displaces other institutional forms of constitutional argument such as legislative constitutional duty only in the mid-twentieth century, as the Court becomes identified with Brown v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 6:35 am
Here’s the key, striking passage from page 7 of the government's petition in Trump v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:05 am
They had come to a rueful admiration of Justice Scalia’s lone dissent from the Supreme Court’s decision, Morrison v. [read post]
