Search for: "Olive v. Olive" Results 1361 - 1380 of 2,024
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2023, 4:00 am by John Willinsky
But then at some point, as you and others are fooled by human v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 8:20 am
(Incidentally, past recess appointments include both Oliver Wendell Holmes and William J. [read post]
1 May 2018, 2:50 am by NCC Staff
Marshall won 29 out of 32 cases he argued in front of the high court, including Brown v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 10:49 pm
In short, German sex toy company Beate Uhse has been ordered by a Hamburg court to pay German football stars Michael Ballack (Chelsea) and Oliver Kahn (Bayern Munich) 50,000 euros each after it used their names to sell vibrators. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 7:41 am
" [abstract] [full paper] Hila Keren, Faculty of Law, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, "Law in the Cultivation of Hope" [abstract] [full paper] Elizabeth V. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 6:24 am by Edith Garwood
CAT equipment has been used to uproot olive trees and destroy other agricultural products and land. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 2:59 am
v=idAUo_fyHW4 His explanation starts at about the two-minute mark.3. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 11:45 am by Stephen Gillers
A district judge refused to dismiss the case (Jovanovic v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
And finally, I've been wondering for a few weeks if John Oliver would weigh in on the Apple v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 1:27 pm by Ken White
Like many people who favor censorship but have a cookie-sheet-shallow grasp of its history, Valenti is misquoting Oliver Wendell Holmes dropping a rhetorical aside in Schenck v. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
"Dragged it kicking and screaming, for it was Justice who ordered Texas to integrate its public schools in 1971 -- 17 years after the Supreme Court's Brown v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 6:09 am
" "A potent precedent favoring the constitutionally-questionable provisions of the United States Patriot Act passed shortly after the September 11, 2001 attacks, the 1917 law was given the Supreme Court's approval in Schenk v United States, when Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote, 'When a nation is at war many things that might be said in time of peace are such a hindrance to its efforts that their utterance will not be endured so long as men fight....'… [read post]