Search for: "P. Johnson" Results 1361 - 1380 of 2,596
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2011, 9:56 am
Johnson, 584 S.W. 2d 703, 704 (Tex. 1979). 3. [read post]
24 May 2007, 7:10 am
Johnson, Director PAP; Geoffrey L. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Michael Weiksner, James Palmiter, DragonGC, on Wednesday, July 24, 2024 Tags: Clawback, Corporate governance, S&P 500, SEC Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies Standards Applicable To Advance Notice Bylaws Posted by Arthur R. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Michael Weiksner, James Palmiter, DragonGC, on Wednesday, July 24, 2024 Tags: Clawback, Corporate governance, S&P 500, SEC Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies Standards Applicable To Advance Notice Bylaws Posted by Arthur R. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:31 am by admin
” For more see: Global Cartels Handbook Ambush Marketing and Brand Protection – Phillip Johnson From OUP: “Ambush marketing is any attempt to create an unauthorised or false association with an event thereby interfering with the legitimate contractual rights of the event’s official marketing partners. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 6:35 pm by cdw
” [via the Court generated summary] Ernest Johnson v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 2:51 am by jameswilson29@gmail.com
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia first recognized the standard of review in bankruptcy appeals: fact findings would be set aside if clearly erroneous, citing Bankruptcy Rule 8013, and legal issues, or mixed issues of law and fact, were decided de novo, citing In re: Johnson, Canal Corp v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 12:04 pm by Rick Hasen
Congresswoman Eddie Bernice Johnson of CD 30 also testified that the plan removed the American Center (home of the Dallas Mavericks), the arts district, her district office, and her home from CD 30. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 2:51 am by jameswilson29@gmail.com
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia first recognized the standard of review in bankruptcy appeals: fact findings would be set aside if clearly erroneous, citing Bankruptcy Rule 8013, and legal issues, or mixed issues of law and fact, were decided de novo, citing In re: Johnson, Canal Corp v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 11:26 am by John Elwood
§ 1396a(p), indicate that Congress clearly and unambiguously intended to create an implied private right of action to challenge a state’s determination that a provider is not “qualified” under the applicable state regulations. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Robins Co., 738 P.2d 1210, 1227-28 (Kan. 1987) (applied to medical device); Johnson v. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 11:16 am by Uthman Law Office
” (§ 1385(c)(1)-(2); Johnson, supra, 83 Cal.App.5th at p. 1091, 299 Cal.Rptr.3d 894 [enactment of Senate Bill 81 “reinforced” conclusion that “Legislature intended to confer on trial courts a range of sentencing options and broad discretion to choose among them”].) [read post]