Search for: "People v Comfort" Results 1361 - 1380 of 2,227
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2016, 2:01 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Based not on borders for their own sake but for the policy reasons we have those boxes/want people to stay within them. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 2:46 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
These are both ways of getting people not to terminate. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Many people acknowledge that Reagan would not be nearly conservative enough for today’s Republican Party, yet the press cannot resist labeling as “moderates” conservative extremists like Susan Collins (who actually believes, among other things, that tax cuts pay for themselves—and who claimed to believe that Brett Kavanaugh would not overturn Roe v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:47 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
A: we can get to a result consumers will be more comfortable with even without a new law, if the industries get together. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
But that is not necessarily what is going on in the minds of people who bring a wrongful birth suit. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 2:59 pm by Giles Peaker
How quick and responsive are people going to believe they are going to be in assessing danger and moving people to a safe location? [read post]
12 May 2024, 3:51 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
That may give parties (at least some) comfort when relying on confidential information in written statements. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 5:06 pm by Steven M. Taber
” This concept is generally utilized by states to protect quasi-sovereign interests such as health, comfort and welfare of the people, interstate water rights, and the general economy of the state. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 7:31 pm
In a harmonious society, the political environment is stable, the economy is prosperous, people live in peace and work in comfort and social welfare improves. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:37 am by SHG
And then there is the non-textual decision, such as the Supreme Court’s Graham v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 9:12 am by Rick Klau
" What Pete Stark said was, yes, corporations are people, which suggests that he's comfortable with the Supreme Court's reasoning. [read post]