Search for: "People v Word"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 17,904
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2022, 7:01 am
In the words of Bush v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 2:45 am
In asking itself that question, the ET had concluded that the act of which Mrs Higgs had been accused, and eventually found guilty, was “posting items on Facebook that might reasonably lead people who read her posts to conclude that she was homophobic and transphobic” and it had been entitled to find that the words shared and endorsed by her might reasonably be regarded as having that effect. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:00 am
” The latest Edelman Trust survey has revealed that two-thirds (67%) of people globally have said that they believe journalists purposely try to mislead people by saying things that are false or grossly exaggerated. [read post]
17 May 2010, 8:52 pm
It should also be pointed out that the categorical v. case-by-case debate is not some new thing that just occurred to people in 2009. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 10:59 am
On April 7, 2008, in North American Medical Corp. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 7:17 am
When people hear the word “whistleblower” they likely think of the few individuals who made recent headlines or were immortalized in a movie (the names Serpico, Brockovich, and Silkwood likely ring a bell even years later). [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 7:10 am
Citing Doe II v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 8:25 am
–Martell v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
The problem is, just two years ago, in Walker v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 4:48 am
Wise of Toronto, about a Proposed Mississippi Bill: Restaurants not to Serve Obese People. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:58 am
In other words, "Ok, they don't work but they scare people". [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 9:39 pm
This is a great tool for studying the history of language and word usage. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 11:20 am
Supreme Court, Robert Cooter of UC Berkeley Law School and I developed a theory of Congress's taxing power that anticipated, and may have influenced, the Court's taxing power analysis in NFIB v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 5:51 am
(Jacobsen v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 7:25 am
The Plessy v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 2:39 am
Merpel notes that the Guardian calls the decision a "landmark" ruling: she wishes people wouldn't use the word for first-instance decisions in disputes that go on appeal -- it's the final ruling that makes the landmark, since trial judges' decisions are often writ in water. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 8:24 am
A Joseph Rowntree Report on homelessness which had found that 38% of homeless people attempted suicide. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
State v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 8:30 am
So what can possibly be at issue in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
