Search for: "People v. Best"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 12,209
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
So precarious does not mean people with leave. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 11:18 am
Beyond that, I refer the reader to the best compilations of briefs and documents that I’ve found and that are prepared by the State Court Report and the website of Our Children’s Trust. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 10:00 am
In State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 10:00 am
In State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 10:25 am
Scholars such as Dhanda have contended that this test is prima facie discriminatory – as it tends to only be applied to people with disabilities, or people who make decisions which conflict with the opinion of professionals as to what is in their best interests (e.g. the refusal of a blood transfusion by a Jehovah’s witness, as in the Fitzpatrick case). [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 7:23 am
Raimondo and Ohio v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 1:16 pm
People v. [read post]
10 Jul 2021, 6:20 am
” People v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 9:24 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 12:06 pm
It is now the subject of a class action lawsuit in Floyd v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:09 am
Attorney General (a/k/a NetChoice v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 5:41 am
On Wednesday 7 March 2012, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights heard the application in the Article 10 case of Animal Defenders International v United Kingdom. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 4:55 pm
Or maybe regular churchgoing is against a child’s best interests. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 9:15 am
In the case of Aleman v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 8:39 am
Miller v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 1:03 pm
Best Interests of the Child While it’s true oral argument advocates exaggerate their arguments in order to make a point, Lisa Blatt’s arguments in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 4:51 am
Inquiring into such facts would inhibit people's freedom by giving aggressors a violent veto over others conduct. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 7:56 am
Citing Jegley v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:22 am
If the City and State of New York were miraculously inclined to embrace the concept, however, the best one could hope for, given what the Supremes have offered up to now, is an onerous application/registration process for ownership of a non-automatic handgun or rifle within the home (only) for the purpose of self-defense by sane, competent and trained people over the age of 21, without any prior felony, and possibly serious misdemeanor, conviction, restraining order, and maybe… [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 12:39 pm
Additionally, the United States Supreme Court, in Troxel v. [read post]
