Search for: "People v. Fell"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 2,577
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2015, 7:33 am
The Court determined that the case fell within the common fund doctrine, “which arises when the attorney has succeeded in securing, augmenting, or preserving property or a fund of money in which other people are entitled to share in common. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:31 pm
We reiterate, however, that each case is fact specific (see, People v West, 271 AD2d 806; People v Brooks, 270 AD2d 206, lv denied 95 NY2d 794; People v Parr, 155 AD2d 945, lv denied 75 NY2d 870 [all holding that a defendant who performs a significant act of domestic violence against a mother in the presence of a child is guilty of endangering the welfare of that child]). [95 N.Y.2d 374] With respect to defendant's appeal, the issues… [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 1:31 pm
See Binderup v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 7:18 am
In, Panteleris v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 2:05 pm
Gonzalez, 262 AD2d 281; Silver v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 12:32 pm
DeJesus v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 10:05 am
That job fell to the GGG which put out a newsletter in November 2014 saying Here Come the Cranes! [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 10:45 am
Median wages for women have remained about the same, but participation by women in the labor force fell from about 60 percent in 2002 down to 57 percent last year. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 2:04 pm
This is what happened to the defendant in People v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 7:50 am
The other people who were displaced suffered as much or (in some cases) even more than Susette Kelo did, although they did not become as famous. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:38 pm
You can find the court’s opinion in Rosebrock v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:18 am
The employer’s motion for summary judgment was denied (Meng v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 10:15 am
In its highly controversial 2005 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 3:37 pm
The problem was based on United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 9:16 am
Wilson v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
Such an interpretation would provide fertile ground to argue that the right to access particular therapies fell within its ambit. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 9:29 am
See People v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 6:57 am
He argued that Congress passed the RLA to protect against the harm that such a strike would impose on uninvolved people all over North America. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:09 pm
Kelly-Brown v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 9:50 am
If anything, there is the rumor that later quality Pythons fell away a bit from their initial high quality. [read post]
