Search for: "People v. Greene"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 2,575
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2014, 4:52 am
As I noted in my earlier post, this emphasis on the individual plaintiffs' role as company decision-makers makes sense, in light of how most people would treat analogous questions of moral culpability in other corporate contexts. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:14 pm
On the eve of Lawrence v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The landowner's actions relying on a valid permit must be so substantial that the municipal action results in serious loss rendering the improvements essentially valueless" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d at 47-48; see Glacial Aggregates LLC v Town of Yorkshire, 14 NY3d at 136; People v Miller, 304 NY at 109; Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d at 544; People ex rel. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 10:29 am
The landowner's actions relying on a valid permit must be so substantial that the municipal action results in serious loss rendering the improvements essentially valueless" (Town of Orangetown v Magee, 88 NY2d at 47-48; see Glacial Aggregates LLC v Town of Yorkshire, 14 NY3d at 136; People v Miller, 304 NY at 109; Matter of RC Enters. v Town of Patterson, 42 AD3d at 544; People ex rel. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 2:54 am
This post was written by Lucy Checkley and Siobhan Hayes New procedures will make it harder to register land as a town or village green (‘TVG’). [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 10:16 pm
Both were admitted for use in open court during the first Oracle v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
It seems that the complete duplication may be “excessive”, in light of the quantity, quality and importance of the material used (Blanch v Koons).Bruno is unimpressed with the dumb Starbucks crownhe has to wear to make his significant human happyIn relation to market effects, would the hundreds of people queuing up for Dumb Starbucks have alternately visited the original coffee retailer that day? [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 11:23 am
* People v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 11:24 am
Rumsfeld v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm
” As I explained in an earlier post, Congress intended RFRA to incorporate by reference the Supreme Court’s Free Exercise Clause jurisprudence from the era preceding Employment Division v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 4:06 am
People took certain precautions ‘in case we **** up’. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 12:19 pm
But it really just upheld the FCC’s discretion to make the call, so a contrary decision would likely receive the same green light. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
In Chippewas of Mnjikaning First Nation v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 2:58 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 1:41 pm
The decision in Reid v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Kendall v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 5:34 pm
The test, however, is nothing new — it’s based on the 1977 decision by 8th Circuit in Green v Missouri Pacific Railroad. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 3:07 pm
The case was Ang v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
Brown v. [read post]
