Search for: "People v. New"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 41,439
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2011, 9:29 am
There are three principal claims.First (Part II), since the New Deal, the Supreme Court has developed a doctrine allowing the regulation of wholly intrastate activity: the substantial effects doctrine. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 4:05 am
Cite as: The People v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 6:45 am
The case is Jones v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 6:00 am
And in Roybal v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 10:38 am
Here’s the beginning: Buchanan v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 5:25 am
In People v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Gitxaala Nation v Canada – The Enbridge Cases The Enbridge proposal would have seen diluted bitumen carried by pipeline approximately 1,200 kilometres from northern Alberta to Kitimat BC, across over 1,000 rivers and streams, to a new marine terminal. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 6:21 pm
Contents include:LectureSundaresh Menon, A Tale of Two Systems: The Public and Private Faces of Investor-State Dispute Settlement Case CommentsJulien Chaisse, Consutel Group SpA in liquidazione v People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria: Umbrella Clauses and Breaches of Contract by Public Entities Gabriel M Lentner & Dayana Zasheva, Bridgestone v Panama: Denial of Justice in a Trade Mark Dispute and the Locus Standi of a Licensee in International Investment… [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 9:33 am
The New York State Assembly has proposed a law that would make sweeping changes to how people communicate on the Internet. [read post]
14 May 2017, 1:56 pm
On May 14, 1973, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Frontiero v. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 11:45 am
In 2017, the ACLU and the law firm of Covington & Burling filed Collins v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 12:51 pm
According to a recent news feature from the Press Herald, rescue workers have just recovered the body of a 14-year-old boy from a river in the New England area. [read post]
14 May 2018, 11:40 am
Doing so, New Jersey contends, is a violation of the anticommandeering principle of Printz v. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:00 pm
See Beclar Corp. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:49 am
And while State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 10:24 am
Make UC a Good Neighbor v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:01 am
The notion that the government could collect similar data on hundreds of millions of people and retain that data for a five-year period, updating it with new data every day in perpetuity, was at best in 1979, the stuff of science fiction. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 7:37 pm
GateHouse Media, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 3:43 pm
The result is a cozy, nicely furnished room for the enjoyment of a few select people. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm
As we know, under the due process clauses of the New York State Constitution, Article I, § 6, and the United States Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment, evidence of a pretrial identification of the defendant is inadmissible if the procedure used is “unnecessarily suggestive” (Neil v Biggers, 409 US 188 [1972]; People v Adams, 53 NY2d 241 [1981]; People v Owens, 74 NY2d 677 [1989]; People v Farraro, 144 AD2d 976… [read post]
