Search for: "People v. Powers" Results 1361 - 1380 of 15,263
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2012, 10:41 pm
But a case from last year, Brennan v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm by Gareth Davies
A rule on signs of religion is purely about how people perceive and are perceived. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  It would  be difficult for most British people to identify any right that is objectionable (unless, perhaps, they are in favour of the death penalty). [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 5:08 am by Transplanted Lawyer
  Legal libertarians read it to say that the rights are inherent in the people, not in the state, and therefore the state must justify its actions in all cases. [read post]
22 Aug 2009, 10:23 am
Dagenhart (1918) that held child labor laws to be beyond Congress's power. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
The basis of the order requiring Facebook to identify TVO was the decision of the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); but it “is a power which for good reasons must be sparingly used” (Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497, 503 (Finlay CJ). [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
Once upon a time, jurors had the power to nullify the law. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 2:20 pm by Unknown
Frey (Treaty Rights) Keweenaw Bay Indian Community v. [read post]