Search for: "People v. Tooks"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 11,093
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2015, 3:52 am
As noted in this memo, the SEC took a similar approach in ’07 with Hewlett-Packard’s shareholder proposal after the AFSCME v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
Rybolovlev admitted that it’s hard for him to trust people, but once he does, he trusts them entirely. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 3:49 am
Shortly thereafter, the caller phoned again, believing she was speaking with Lopez-Cruz, but instead informed Soto that there were two people next to a house where there was a lot of lighting, and gave instructions to drive there, flash his high beams, and the two people would come out. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 4:40 pm
Not long after posting about spam, I picked up (via the Tech News Review feed) this story from Friday’s Times, a report of a case (Microsoft v McDonald, 12 December 2006, Levinson J in the High Court, Chancery) from the tail end of 2006…where Microsoft took on the spammers and…well, IPKat has a good summary, so over to them: Microsoft normally protected Hotmail subscribers against spam by setting up its own ‘target accounts’, which it used as decoys to… [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:51 am
Co. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 7:41 pm
In Washington v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:50 am
If fully informed, I think most people would agree with the 1989 rule of Penry v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 12:17 pm
Yesterday marked the twenty-first anniversary of Olmstead v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 7:17 am
Martin v. [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 11:58 am
Wu v. [read post]
15 May 2010, 3:23 am
However, the scope, duration and intensity of a seizure, and any subsequent search, “remain subject to the strictures of article I, §12, and judicial review” (People v Troiano, 35 NY2d 476 [1974]; People v Marsh, 20 NY2d 98 [1967]). [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:43 pm
YouTube, UMG v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 9:01 pm
In Utah v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 2:21 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 4:40 am
Hobbs (Voting Rights Act)Hawkins v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 8:41 am
People must feel – and actually be – safe while accessing health care, but the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Matter of Fishman, 22 A.D.3d 100, 2005 NYSlipOp 06802 Matter of Calonge v Calonge, 52 AD3d 1111, 2008 NYSlipOp 05630; Matter of Marino, 73 A.D.3d 5, 2010 NYSlipOp 01800; Matter of McKenzie, 177 AD3d 134, 2019 NYSlipOp 06729; People v Jenkins, 55 Misc 3d 1207(A), 2017 NYSlipOp 50449(U); and People v Williams, 20 AD3d 72, 2005 NYSlipOp 04317. ** Respondent stipulated that [1] he stands… [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 12:35 pm
In this case, C1.G. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Matter of Fishman, 22 A.D.3d 100, 2005 NYSlipOp 06802 Matter of Calonge v Calonge, 52 AD3d 1111, 2008 NYSlipOp 05630; Matter of Marino, 73 A.D.3d 5, 2010 NYSlipOp 01800; Matter of McKenzie, 177 AD3d 134, 2019 NYSlipOp 06729; People v Jenkins, 55 Misc 3d 1207(A), 2017 NYSlipOp 50449(U); and People v Williams, 20 AD3d 72, 2005 NYSlipOp 04317. ** Respondent stipulated that [1] he stands… [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 11:33 am
” In B.L. v. [read post]
