Search for: "Plante v. State" Results 1361 - 1380 of 4,069
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2023, 7:24 am by Dan Farber
Ever since the Supreme Court decided West Virginia v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 12:25 pm
Analysis of out-of-title work claim controlled by the duties and allocation of the positions involved at the time the work was performedMatter of Kopyt v Governor's Office of Employee Relations, 2008 NY Slip Op 08222, Decided on October 30, 2008, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe Governor's Office of Employee Relations adopted the findings of the Division of Classification and Compensation of the New York State Department of Civil Service in deciding out-of-title… [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:58 am by Marissa Miller
” Justice Ginsburg argued that the Justices should have delayed hearing such cases while the state-by-state process evolved, or alternatively, should have struck down just the Texas law without declaring a right to privacy that legalized the procedure nationwide The ABA Journal’s Jill Schachner Chanen discusses the film The Loving Story, a documentary on the couple behind the Court’s landmark decision in Loving v. [read post]
In other words, if a landlord does not want the tenant to have the right to harvest the corn stover, the written lease must state that the aboveground part of a plant associated with a crop belongs to the landlord. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:22 pm by WIMS
"       On September 12, in a lengthy company release, Luminant, the largest power generator in Texas that employees approximately 4,400 employees throughout the state (2,580 in coal plant and mining operations) announced the need to close facilities and layoff workers to comply with U.S. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 6:35 am by Bill Marler
In particular, the court case (Supreme Beef v USDA) limited the ability of USDA to enforce its regulations, effectively barring the government from shutting down a plant which fails to meet safety standards for Salmonella. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 6:24 am by Bill Marler
In particular, the court case (Supreme Beef v USDA) limited the ability of USDA to enforce its regulations, effectively barring the government from shutting down a plant which fails to meet safety standards for Salmonella. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 6:28 am
Here are some examples:In short, I meet officers in the agencies undertaking interception work and officials in the departments of the Secretaries of State/Ministers which issue the warrants. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 10:30 pm
As the United States Supreme Court wrote in Chessman v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 6:32 am by Brian Peterson
Supreme Court, Oct. 23, 2014), the employee was picketing along a public road leading to his employer's plant. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 1:39 pm by Joe Koncelik
District Court of Maryland in Sherrill, et al. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 7:07 am by Söğüt Atilla
” According to the AG, the implementation of the InfoSoc Directive means that EU Member States are precluded from freely applying Article 2(7) of the Berne Convention. [read post]