Search for: "Price v. Price" Results 1361 - 1380 of 18,264
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2018, 9:27 pm by HowardGutman
— A person may not advertise for sale merchandise, commodities, or service through an advertisement describing the merchandise, commodities, or service: (1) As part of a plan or scheme with the intent not to sell the merchandise, commodity, or service at the advertised price; or (2) With the intent not to sell the merchandise, commodity, or service.Typical Cases  Laster v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:13 am
Here is a link to NMCCA's unanimous, en banc opinion in United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:29 am by NL
Westlea Housing Association v Price, Swindon County Court, 20 & 21 Jan 2011 An ASB possession case, successfully defended at least partly on the basis that the landlord had failed to give support or seek intervention by social services or others, despite knowing something of the situation. [read post]
4 Aug 2007, 7:35 pm
  This is especially true with full-ratchet anti-dilution protection because the issuance of even 1 share at a price lower than a series of preferred stock will result in an adjustment of the conversion price of all shares of that series of preferred stock. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:25 am by Heather M. Milligan
My favorite is how in some big firms, partners of equal experience charge different rates, and associates are paid differently, based on their location (New York v. [read post]