Search for: "STATE v HOLMES" Results 1361 - 1380 of 1,545
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As a Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. wrote in the 1892 case of McAuliffe v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
The beginnings and development of copyright and the First Amendment are still under-observed: Eldred v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:13 am by Roshonda Scipio
: cultural, legal and philosophical challenges / Anine Kierulf & Helge Rønning (eds.).Göteborg, Sweden: Nordicom, [2009] Gaming LawKF8210.G35 U53 2010Understanding gaming law issues : leading lawyers on understanding recent changes in state and tribal gambling, handling economic and regulatory pressures, and anticipating future legal trends. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 4:02 am
§ 1679, et seq., prohibits provisions that purport to waive a consumer's right to sue in court for CROA violations.Pregnant welder sues employer for discriminationRoetzel & AndressOn August 10, 2010, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision in Spees v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 5:01 am by Ben Johnson
Less than one year after Olmstead, the Court granted certiorari in Maryland Casualty v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Last week, the Supreme Court unanimously reversed their convictions.Writing for the Court in Kelly v. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
United States District Court, 503 U.S. 653 (1992) .................................................4 Gregg v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
The United States now uses a life + 70 copyright regime, but only for works created on and after January 1, 1978. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:21 am
Judge stopped father's evidence, stating that he had failed to show cause to support a change of residence. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 12:49 am by Giles Peaker
See paragraph 13(a) of my decision in RJ v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2012] AACR 28. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:08 pm by Bill Merkel
Hamilton in his Report of the Bank and Marshall in McColloch v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am by Bruce Ackerman
They feared it would set a disastrous higher lawmaking precedent: After all, requiring the abolition of poll taxes in federal, but not state, elections represented a relatively minor incursion on state sovereignty. [read post]