Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 19,294
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2012, 10:43 am
The new license permits direct sales to New Jersey consumers, including internet sales. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 10:32 am
Addressed in the context of a marihuana (marijuana) sale, In People v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 1:05 am
Lord Hughes states that the acid test should be whether the application is in substance (impermissibly) to vary or alter the final order or whether it is (permissibly) to support it by working out how it should be carried into effect [54]. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
The State of New York Court of Appeals strictly limited “all persons-present” warrants in People v. [read post]
29 May 2017, 10:00 pm
” Today, In Impressions Products, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 2:28 pm
In Stoloff v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 7:42 am
Theatre District Realty Corp. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 3:22 am
The amended complaint stated that Ingrao sent the buyer's attorney a letter "purporting to terminate" the contract of sale and returning the deposit. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 7:08 am
It remanded back to the district court to consider the infringement claim under the proper standard (Underwood v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
In referring to the recent TCL v Ericsson decision from the Central District of California (see Kat post here), Judge Labson stated:"The Court is not persuaded by Plaintiffs’ argument that summary judgment on Count III of the FAC is warranted. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 3:27 am
A second, July, contract was for the sale and purchase of 150,000 mt of sulphur at $895 per ton. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 11:39 am
In determining the commercial reasonableness of the sale, the Court referred to its prior decision in Walker v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:18 pm
Toyota evidently hoped that the district court would not notice the careful parsing of its language, and that the Tabaris (who are defending this case pro se) would not call it to the court’s attention.Toyota is playing the same game on appeal: It states that bifurcation was proper because '[t]here was no factual overlap between Toyota’s trademark claims and Fast Imports’ interference claims.' But Toyota is only telling half the story by talking about only half… [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
SHIREY V. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 5:30 am
Cardinale v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 6:15 am
"Here, the Board found, "the sale of two ADD A ZERO caps at a minimal cost within the state of Illinois to Ms. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:04 am
These “sale and rent back” schemes operated during a period when sale and rent back transactions were common yet unregulated. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 11:25 am
Those covenants incidental to the sale of a business are subject to a common law rule of reason, while those tied to employment are governed by a stricter standard of scrutiny requiring the courts to examine certain other factors (which vary state-by-state).But not all employment-related covenants merit strict scrutiny. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
(b) as a result of the absence of such information, the offer for sale or sale of the unboxed products constitutes a criminal offence according to the law of the Member State of the Community in which they are offered for sale or sold by third parties? [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 12:40 pm
In Arsali v. [read post]
