Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 21,150
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2022, 6:05 am
With the Supreme Court seemingly poised to overturn Roe v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 8:14 am
United States, 816 F. 2d 647, 656 (1987) (stating the on-sale bar “does not lend itself to formulation into a set of precise requirements”). [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:12 am
” Overstock.com, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
It states that the EU trade mark rules apply to offers for sale and advertisements relating to trade-marked goods located in third States as soon as it is clear that those offers for sale and advertisements are targeted at consumers in the EU.It is for the national courts to assess, on a case-by-case basis, whether there are any relevant factors on the basis of which it may be concluded that an offer for sale or an advertisement, displayed on an online… [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:00 am
Slitor v Elia, 544 So. 2d 255 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). [read post]
16 May 2016, 2:00 am
Slitor v Elia, 544 So. 2d 255 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:05 pm
In the recent decision of Merion Capital LP v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 1:27 pm
Entertainment Merchants, concerning a State's ability to restrict the sale of violent video games to minors and the First Amendment right to free speech; Snyder v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm
United States and the tax in Moore v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 12:06 pm
Becton, Dickinson & Co. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 11:45 am
HOME CORPORATION v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 5:58 am
In 2009, Mr Dill removed and arranged for the sale of the urns at auction, which sold for £55,000. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 12:47 pm
Nevertheless, it was persuaded by a recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in Quality King Distributors, v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 12:49 pm
C & A Carbone, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:49 pm
Wayfair, allowing states to require Internet retailers to collect sales taxes. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 4:10 am
State Farm’s “reprehensible conduct” In its Campbell v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:55 pm
The acknowledgment form further stated it was “subject to” the Conditions of Sale printed on the reverse side of the form, which purported to limit liability for consequential damages and disclaim any express or implied warranties. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:20 am
Tellinghuisen, the Attorney General for the state of South Dakota, whose argument in South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 2:07 pm
Then along comes CSX Transportation v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
In Anderson v. [read post]
