Search for: "Standard Jury Instructions-Criminal Cases"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 1,720
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
The National Requirement prescribes some areas of required substantive knowledge: (1) foundational common-law principles; (2) ethics and professionalism (3) Canadian constitutional, criminal, and administrative law; and (4) contracts, torts, and property law. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 12:22 pm
In most criminal cases, both sides roughly agree on which part or parts of the statute bear on the case. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
Marcus, No. 08-1341 (5/24/2010) The circuit court impermissibly water downed the “plain error ” standard. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
” After all, the Department of Justice and the grand jury have charged hundreds of individuals in connection with the January 6 attack on the Capitol—some even with “seditious conspiracy” under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
27 May 2010, 10:30 am
Lynaugh, and holding that the Texas “special issue” jury instructions violated Supreme Court precedents requiring that jurors be given the opportunity “to give meaningful consideration and effect to all mitigating evidence that might provide a basis for refusing to impose the death penalty. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 6:27 pm
[Footnote: Of course, rap lyric evidence that provides direct proof against a defendant -- such as an admission or details that are not generally known and dovetail with the facts of the case -- should be analyzed for relevance under N.J.R.E. 401 and evaluated under N.J.R.E. 403's standard for prejudice, and not the standard for prejudice under a Cofield analysis. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am
A grant in this case would make next term very interesting indeed. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
At the same time, though, the criminal denaturalization statute also requires the government to meet a higher standard than is imposed under the civil statute: It must bring the charges within 10 years of the false statement, prove its case to the jury “beyond a reasonable doubt,” and provide the defendant with due process. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 6:07 am
A principal virtue of Crawford is that it recognizes that the confrontation right, just like the right to counsel and the right to jury, is a basic procedural right that we adhere to as a uniform matter; we do not decide case by case whether it is worthwhile in the particular circumstances. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 12:30 pm
The jury instructions were fine. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 8:26 am
* * * MEDICAL EXPERT: I said it was milder than some, as you may recall, but that she had a moderately severe dementia syndrome. * * * [MEDICAL MALPRACTICE LAWYER FOR PLAINTIFF]: Now, the case before that, that you testified in court, was a criminal case, right? [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 8:26 am
* * * MEDICAL EXPERT: I said it was milder than some, as you may recall, but that she had a moderately severe dementia syndrome. * * * [MEDICAL MALPRACTICE LAWYER FOR PLAINTIFF]: Now, the case before that, that you testified in court, was a criminal case, right? [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 7:46 am
” However, it is important to note that the only U.S. published court case interpreting the Tokyo Convention applied an objective negligence standard of reasonableness instead of the more deferential and subjective “arbitrary and capricious standard” that governs claims for domestic flights under U.S. federal regulations. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:51 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit’s judgment and instruct that court to remand [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 11:41 pm
In this case, the jury found both Exxon and Captain Hazelwood to have acted recklessly, not maliciously. [read post]
16 May 2008, 9:41 am
" NFP criminal opinions today (11): Joshua D. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
Turner, a case that challenges the constitutionality of the statute. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 3:55 pm
" Watch for Nacchio's lawyers to seize on this argument when fighting over jury instructions on remand. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 12:59 pm
It shows that Garrison's counsel `gave an opening statement; examined and cross-examined witnesses’ extensively, including the police officers who testified about IP addresses, as discussed below; `preserved objections to evidence; gave significant input on jury instructions; and presented a lengthy closing argument. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm
Cases like Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. [read post]
