Search for: "State v. Case"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 193,580
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2024, 9:56 am
The case-law of a Member State, while it is not binding on the EU Courts, may provide relevant indications about the relevant public’s perception of the sign at issue in that state (see para 58, with reference to GC judgment T-40/03 – Julián Murúa Entrena, EU:T:2005:285, para 69). [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:56 am
The case-law of a Member State, while it is not binding on the EU Courts, may provide relevant indications about the relevant public’s perception of the sign at issue in that state (see para 58, with reference to GC judgment T-40/03 – Julián Murúa Entrena, EU:T:2005:285, para 69). [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:43 am
And then under Nixon came a case called Nixon v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:31 am
A fair piece.Even in state law cases. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:16 am
(See People v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 8:22 am
” Aftering making these determinations, the Court articulated the legal consequences for both Israel and other States. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 7:01 am
Constitution protects individuals from being compelled to incriminate themselves during a criminal investigation, a right commonly known as “Miranda rights” after the landmark Supreme Court case Miranda v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 6:36 am
Finally, the cases of State v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 5:30 am
The situation began to change as the court in Nelson v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 5:13 am
The court properly dismissed plaintiff’s claim pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) because he failed to state a cause of action (Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87 [1994]). [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 5:01 am
United States (9th Cir. 1989) (no right of access to ex parte warrant application before indictment); States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 5:00 am
No Rubber StampsIn the case of Moore v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 4:51 am
In a post-trial opinion handed down earlier this month by Vice Chancellor Will in Gibson v Konick, the court ordered dissolution of an LLC formed for the purpose of owning a vacation home. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 4:32 am
It's part of why I think Trump v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 3:00 am
And that test is the enhanced scrutiny test, as articulated in Coster v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 2:40 am
EEOC v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 12:07 am
No serious patent practitioner will be very surprised by this headnote, which is firmly based on Art. 69 EPC and the Protocol on Interpretation and fully in line with the established national jurisprudence in the UPC member states, notably with German case law. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 9:06 pm
In May, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in National Rifle Association v. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
A recent case, Ohio v. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
While the validity of such a clause under Delaware law had remained uncertain, in a recent case, Crispo v. [read post]
