Search for: "State v. Foster " Results 1361 - 1380 of 4,034
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2009, 9:15 am by Rosa Fruehling-Watson
For a discussion regarding the treatment of investigative materials under Washington State’s Public Records Act, see Foster Pepper's news alert regarding Soter v. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 4:03 am
Oregon on State v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 3:23 pm
What does seem clear is that Miami Dade State Attorney has fostered conditions permissive to a toxic culture. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
In other words, if a gay child needs foster placement, a faith-based organization that views being LGBTQ as sinful and that receives state funds can flat-out refuse without consequence. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
In other words, if a gay child needs foster placement, a faith-based organization that views being LGBTQ as sinful and that receives state funds can flat-out refuse without consequence. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:39 am by Adam Baker
On the issue of tort liability in the context of the preparation of tenders – arising as a result of a plaintiff’s past relationship with the party preparing the tender – the court held that as a matter of policy it would be fundamentally inconsistent to with the basic rationale of tendering of fostering competition between bidders to extend such a duty in respect of particular bidders who might as a result obtain an unfair advantage in bidding. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 7:03 am by Anna Christensen
Today, coverage continues of yesterday's oral arguments in Al-Maqaleh v. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 2:17 pm by Susan L. Friedman
Foster children do not have a legal relationship with their foster parents. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
The facts of Richard v BBC [2018] EWHC 1837 (Ch) help demonstrate this. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 6:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” To establish causation, a plaintiff must show that he or she would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages, but for the lawyer’s negligence'” (Bells v Foster, 83 AD3d at 877, quoting Kennedy v H. [read post]