Search for: "State v. Jacobs"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 1,842
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2012, 9:19 am
If someone else made the comments, not so much.The case is Chao v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 12:49 am
s ICLQ Chinese Judgment Enforced in the United States [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 6:09 am
"The case is Cox v. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 1:08 pm
AJ Jacobs points adds an interesting twist to this analysis. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:45 am
Jacobs, § 6.8. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:33 am
Next week’s topics will be: Florence v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 8:10 am
Cal.). in Loggins v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
See State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:09 am
Gambling machines STATE OF TEXAS v. $1,760.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, 37 "8" LINER MACHINES, No. 12-0718 Per Curiam The Court agreed with the State that certain “eight-liner” machines qualified as gambling equipment for purposes of civil forfeiture. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am
Knight (EPLAW) (IPKat) INTA special reports: Sir Robin Jacob’s speech; a century of trade mark law; damages in Europe (IPKat) (IPKat) (IPKat) United States US Patent Reform What Congress should do to fix the patent system, step 1 (Patenthink) Patent Reform Update: Summer debate ahead for America Invents Act (Patent Law Practice Center) How Article One relates to patent quality and reform (Patent Quality Matters) US Patents USPTO expands first action interview pilot program… [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 11:04 am
From Thursday's Finchem v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:21 am
Sigalit v Kahlon Last week, in Sigalit v Kahlon, 21-cv-08921 (SDNY Aug. 30, 2023) United States District Judge Analisa Torres granted the Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on an accounting claim. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 6:12 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:28 am
In patent academic circles, this has sometimes been referred to as the “Angora Cat” approach as noted by Lord Justice Jacob in European Central Bank v Document Security Systems Inc, [2008] EWCA Civ 192, where he said, at paragraph 5 of the report: Professor Mario Franzosi likens a patentee to an Angora cat. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 11:32 am
Jeremy Gordon summarized the oral argument in the Supreme Court’s Hungary v. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 7:53 am
In Oklahoma v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:30 pm
Davis and Jacob E. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 3:54 am
Justice Jacobs went on to delineate the difference between the two concepts of good faith by endorsing and quoting Vice Chancellor Laster’s explanation in ASB Allegiance Real Estate Fund v. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 9:38 am
In Carroll v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 8:58 pm
” (Rosenman v. [read post]
