Search for: "State v. Kent"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 1,643
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2009, 10:12 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0038, 2009 MT 352N, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 10:27 pm
County of Kent, 510 U.S. 355 (1994). [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 8:13 am
At issue in the case is whether a judge can order a detainee released onto United States soil. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:49 pm
The Court also ordered the Kent County Prosecuting Attorney to respond to an application for leave to appeal in People v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 11:50 am
Sheldon H Nahmod (Chicago-Kent College of Law - Institute for Law and the Humanities) has posted Constitutional Torts, Over-Deterrence and Supervisory Liability after IQBAL (Lewis & Clark Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 6:51 am
The First Amendment issues in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 8:51 am
More on Baze v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
Yesterday, the Court heard arguments in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 12:06 pm
§ 922(x)(2)(A) does not violate the Second Amendment, and we reaffirm our holding in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 8:30 am
One such case in which cert was denied, as noted by SCOTUSblog, was a "test of the constitutionality of the death penalty procedures in the state of Louisiana (Holmes v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 7:31 am
Kent County has since revised its database to address this problem. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 1:38 pm
Supreme Court has decided to take up the case of Berghuis v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 10:11 am
See San Saba Energy, L.P. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 6:19 am
At Crime and Consequences Blog, Kent Scheidegger recaps a recent Michigan Law Review essay on the DNA testimony at issue in McDaniel v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 6:59 pm
This same idea was echoed by later influential jurists such as New York's Chancellor Kent in cases like Livingston v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 6:00 am
At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger reports on the Court’s stay in Mosley v. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 3:42 pm
Best scholarly treatment of the subject is Professor Michael Kent Curtis's No State Shall Abridge: The Fourteenth Amendment and the Bill of Rights (1986). [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:53 am
The Los Angeles Times continues the discussion over United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 10:42 pm
In United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 9:28 pm
§ § 1-16, to the exclusion of any provisions of state law that are inconsistent with the federal act. [read post]
