Search for: "State v. Levine" Results 1361 - 1380 of 1,753
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2023, 3:30 am by Liz Dunshee
Your next IPO may be a direct listing, thanks in part to a unanimous opinion issued by the US Supreme Court last week in Slack Technologies v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
There’s a great quote from the 5th Circuit’s 1981 decision in Huddleston v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 5:26 am by SHG
In a complaint eerily reminiscent of Rakofsky v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 2:48 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Caldwell v Gutman, Mintz, Baker Sonnfeldt, P.C. ; 2011 NY Slip Op 52116(U) ; Decided on November 25, 2011 ; Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Kings County ; Levine, J. give a full history of the conflict. [read post]
8 Dec 2018, 8:00 am by Mikhaila Fogel
Elena Chacko analyzed on the Israeli Supreme Court’s recent decision in Tabish v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 6:00 am
Upon reaching a point where the party of the second part (Light Bulb) becomes separated from the party of the third part ("Receptacle"), the party of the first part (Lawyer) shall have the option of disposing of the party of the second part (Light Bulb) in a manner consistent with all applicable state,local and federal statutes.3.) [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:59 am by Bexis
  Supposedly, Levine somehow limits Buckman even though not even Levine itself claimed to do that. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Supreme Court’s Shelby County v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:30 am by Greg Ablavsky
John’s UniversityCOMMENT: Deborah Rosen, Lafayette College11:00-12:45: Slavery, Movement, and the Law: New Approaches to Gradual Abolition(hopefully close to the session above)PRESIDING: Daniel Hamilton, University of Illinois “Not very Fanatical on the Subject of Slavery:” Fugitive Slaves and the Persistence of Slavery in New Jersey, 1804-1846 James Gigantino, University of Arkansas The Conflict of Laws in the Crossing of Borders: Slavery and Antislavery… [read post]
31 May 2012, 10:14 am by Aaron Marr Page
Golden, 15 N.Y.2d 9, 13 (1964) (to violate public policy exception a judgment must be “inherently vicious, wicked or immoral, and shocking to the prevailing moral sense”); Ackermann v. [read post]