Search for: "State v. Lyles"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 1,491
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2008, 9:40 pm
The core issue in Indiana v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 8:25 am
In its appeal to the United States Supreme Court, Indiana v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 12:58 am
If a mentally ill person chooses to represent themselves at trial and can't put on a coherent defense that rises above the level of babbling, I'd think that calls into question the quality of the court's decision that the person was "competent" to stand trial in the first place.But attorneys for states and the federal government argued at SCOTUS this week in Indiana v. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 9:16 am
Geren (06-1666) and Geren v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 7:38 am
Lyle Denniston reports, "States win over President on criminal law issue," in Medellin v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 7:29 am
The decision came in the case of Medellin v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 7:12 am
United States, No. 06-1509. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 6:47 am
United States in a post here called “Practice Pointer: Navigating a Novel Cert. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 12:35 pm
DeWolff, Boberg & Associates, Inc., No. 06-856: opinion here and oral argument transcript here.At "SCOTUSblog," Lyle Denniston has posts titled "State laws preempted in three areas" and "States allowed to expand criminal rights. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 8:41 am
Lyle Denniston at SCOTUS Blog has, "States allowed to expand criminal rights. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 8:36 am
Justice John Paul Stevens wrote for the majority in Danforth v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 9:35 am
His application (Callahan v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:32 pm
Alabama legal sources said that attorneys for James Callahan, facing execution in that state at 6 p.m. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 7:08 am
Supreme Court today issued its ruling in New York State Board of Elections v. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 9:30 am
For the time being, I can recommend Lyle Denniston's thorough summary of the brief. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 12:56 pm
Lyle Denniston reports that the Supreme Court has granted certiorari in Giles v. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 1:33 pm
United States, No. 07-6395, seeking review of United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 7:10 am
United States, No. 06-1164. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 9:16 am
In a rapid-fire question-and-answer with three lawyersin Baze v. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 9:14 pm
Information on Coker v. [read post]
