Search for: "State v. Masters" Results 1361 - 1380 of 3,927
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
On 7 July 2017, the Court of Appeal (Master of the Rolls, Longmore and Sharp LJ) handed down judgment in the case of Brevan Howard Asset Management v Reuters [2017] EWCA Civ 950. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 9:24 am
In a footnote appended to the reference to a “master inquiry search” above, the court explains that a “master inquiry performs a search of a variety of local, state, and federal agencies. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 3:24 am by James Scott
  For example, ES interests failed to produce a witness statement signed by their Master. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 11:34 am
 Simplifying Community Registered Design litigation in the UK - Spin Master v PMSGuestKat Rosie Burbidge also reminds readers that there are so many hints in the recent decision Spin Master v PMS [2017] EWHC 1477 (Pat) that Mr Justice Carr wants it to get wider circulation. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 7:03 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Schlosser PDF Swinomish Indian Tribal Community v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On 28 June 2017, the Court of Appeal (Master of the Rolls, Longmore and Sharp LJJ) heard the appeal in the case of Brevan Howard Asset Management LLP v Reuters Ltd. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:01 am by Elizabeth A. Khalil
The long-awaited  Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in the case of Fourth Corner Credit Union v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:01 am by Elizabeth A. Khalil
The long-awaited  Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in the case of Fourth Corner Credit Union v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
The Henri Van Breda case (Van Breda v Media 24 Limited and Others [2017] ZASCA 97) has confirmed that cameras in courts are not only here to stay, but that this is mandated by the South African Constitution in order to facilitate open justice and the right of the public to hear and see what goes on in our courts. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 8:12 am by Joy Waltemath
” Second, federal question jurisdiction arises where a state-law claim “necessarily raises a stated federal issue, actually disputed and substantial, which a federal forum may entertain without disturbing any congressionally approved balance of federal and state judicial responsibilities. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 8:01 am by Steven Boutwell
The Court evaluated the events in light of six factors that were developed by the Court in Davis & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am by Francisco Macías
  On appeal to the supreme court of the state, the judgment was affirmed [. . .].'” 1921—Kirby v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Opai v Attorney-General (formerly Opai v Culpan) On 18 May 2017, Katz J ruled on the plaintiff’s application for review of orders made by an Associate Judge (formerly a Master) – possibly the last such review to be heard prior to the commencement of the Senior Courts Act 2016. [read post]