Search for: "State v. Nations" Results 1361 - 1380 of 42,854
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2008, 1:47 pm
The first case of the day will be Altria Group and Phillip Morris v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 3:02 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Thorpe Petition and Appendix (00059355) Question presented: The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) applies to “any” institution or state or local government agency that receives federal funds and “has possession of, or control over,” Native American human remains. [read post]
8 Oct 2016, 10:16 am by The Law Offices of Richard Ansara, P.A.
National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co., Oct. 5, 2016, North Dakota Supreme Court More Blog Entries: Holt v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 7:08 pm by Kali Borkoski
  There was extensive coverage of, and a variety of reactions to, the Court’s decision today in Brown v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 7:48 am by Erin Miller
United States, Schwab v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 2:29 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Rather, under well-established Supreme Court precedent, Snepp v. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 12:00 am
"Yes, we do this sort of work, but the state also will appoint a lawyer to do it. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 2:14 am by tracey
Oguz v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Centre for Advice on Individual Rights in Europe intervening) C-186/10;  [2011] WLR (D)  259 “Article 41(1) of the Additional Protocol, signed on 23 November 1970 at Brussels and concluded, approved and confirmed on behalf of the Community by Council Regulation (EEC) No 2760/72 (OJ 1973 C 113 p17), had to be interpreted as meaning that it could be relied on by a Turkish national who, having… [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 7:14 am by Allard Knook
Consequently, even though the sums involved in the measure at issue were not held permanently by the public authorities, the fact that they remained constantly under public control, and therefore available to the competent national authorities, was sufficient for them to be categorised as State resources (see, to that effect, Case C‑83/98 P France v Ladbroke Racing and Commission [2000] ). [read post]
27 Dec 2007, 8:35 am
The Second Circuit recently upheld a ruling stating that the OCC is the exclusive enforcer of banking laws for national banks in Clearing House Association, LLC v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 11:49 am by Mark Murakami
  The PVA,  46 U.S.C. 31102, allows suits against the United States by foreign nationals if their countries would similarly allow a suit. [read post]