Search for: "State v. Ready"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 4,893
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2021, 4:08 am
§ 424a(d) explicitly states that a triennial redetermination is not applicable in reverse offset states.Because the NJ Legislature did not include a cost-of-living increase in the statute, and the federal statute exempts reverse offset states from reviewing its benefits triennially, we affirm the order denying a redetermination of benefits and for the reimbursement of overpayment of benefits.Wilhelm v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 11:30 am
State v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 6:00 am
District Court for the Western District of Washington, temporarily prevented those items from being removed from the USML on March 6 by issuing a preliminary nationwide injunction in State of Washington v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
The International Court of Justice opinion in Nicaragua v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 4:46 pm
” Peak v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 5:16 am
United States and Fong Yue Ting v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 5:06 pm
The conclusion reached in the case of Ligue Contre Le Racisme v. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 4:32 am
Those assets should then be distribited to holders of debt owed by the “old Chrysler,” the funds argued in Indiana State Police Pension Trust, et al., v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 7:11 am
See Franks v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 7:11 am
See Franks v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 4:03 pm
You don’t need to acknowledge any amendment analogues, super-statutes, or non-Article V changes when you’ve got at least five straight-up Article V Amendments (leaving aside here Bruce’s powerful argument that the Reconstruction Amendments did not in fact satisfy the formal requirements of Article V). [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:27 pm
Below, Elisabeth Oppenheimer of Stanford Law School previews Stop the Beach Renourishment v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 4:00 am
V. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 9:00 pm
My two-day marijuana trial was dismissed yesterday when the prosecutor was not ready for trial. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 10:10 am
” Midland Hotel Corp. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:33 pm
For whatever reason (it seems odd to us, but we are loath to second-guess counsel’s litigation strategy without knowing more than what is stated in the opinions), Penn did not ask the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to overturn Kaczkowski. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 10:30 am
In particular, the Court has scheduled the next MDL bellwether case – Byers v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 11:46 am
People v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 12:03 am
Until Baze v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 11:10 pm
"So there won't be a jury verdict that states a specific FRAND rate. [read post]
