Search for: "State v. Small"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 15,206
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2024, 7:42 am
Goliath v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:15 pm
Court of Federal Claims issued its ruling in Miles Construction, LLC v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 5:22 am
Dale v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:06 am
Ireland, TV Vest v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
John Ely cast his representation-reinforcement theory partly as a defense of Warren Court liberalism, though he rejected Roe v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 4:39 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 4:31 am
United States v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 3:54 pm
In Leather, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
Retromark Volume V: the last six months in trade marks1. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
Imagine a ratification deadline is months away and only a small number of states have ratified. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:12 am
In February last year, National Small Industries v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 8:32 am
The brief, submitted in United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 10:34 am
Many states have "mini-COBRA" that are state laws that provide for a continuation of health insurance even if employers are too small to be subject to COBRA. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 2:28 am
Champagne corks may have been popping in Chancery Lane last night, but the success of the Law Society in its challenge to the Legal Services Commission’s family tender process is no more than a small victory in a war that cannot be won.As the UK Human Rights Blog states, the decision "may only serve to delay the inevitable ... with the system of legal aid under enormous budgetary pressure". [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:39 pm
Without knowing the size of the settlement one can’t say whether it may serve some deterrent function in the future, but I have to wonder if it was large enough to achieve that.Incidentally, the note attached to the check says there’s a second, separate lawsuit,, Ross v. [read post]
Bush v. Lone Oak Club – Texas Supreme Court Once Again Dives Into the Arcane Law of Water Boundaries
25 May 2020, 11:20 pm
In Bush v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 9:02 pm
State v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:22 am
Infringement - The de minimis principle in quia timet actionsThe de minimis principle has been considered in previous patent authorities (Hoechst v BP [1998], Monsanto v Cargill [2007], Napp v Ratiopharm [2009], Lundbeck v Norpharma [2011]). [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 10:30 am
The Colorado state courts rejected this argument. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 5:00 am
Wade and Dred Scott v. [read post]
