Search for: "State v. Taylor"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 3,087
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Courts in New York State have consistently recognized the importance of using progressive discipline.Rulings by the New York State Supreme Court, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, and the Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, suggest an employer’s in assigning severe penalties for certain “first offenses” may not survive judicial review. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:00 pm
See Bissonnette v. [read post]
25 Jan 2020, 1:59 pm
Taylor shared the episode for the third day of the trial; those for the first two days can be found in her post introducing The Impeachment. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 1:10 pm
See Mosby v. [read post]
Blog Post: Practical Guidance Offers Help with Workplace Issues during Mental Health Awareness Month
13 May 2024, 10:00 pm
See Bradford v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 1:22 pm
Id.; See Taylor v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 6:20 pm
Taylor, requires reversal. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 5:26 am
Taylor v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 4:46 pm
[Taylor v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 11:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
" * See Matter of City of Watertown v State of N.Y. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
" * See Matter of City of Watertown v State of N.Y. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:07 pm
State v. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
As the Supreme Court held in Heck v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am
From April 2018 until June 2020, the defendant Marcus Stones (industry name “Mickey Taylor”) operated a performer account and fan page on the Just For Fans website. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am
Stuart Taylor Jr. of the National Journal concurs. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 1:30 pm
In 2001, the US Supreme Court handed down Atwater v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 1:50 pm
Case Name: KELVIN BOURKE v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 5:04 pm
Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 413 (2000).Under the "unreasonable application" clause, a federal habeas court may grant the writ if the state court identifies the correct governing legal principle from this Court's decisions but unreasonably applies that principle to the facts of the prisoner's case.Unfortunately, an otherwise good Fourth Circuit opinion, Green v. [read post]
