Search for: "State v. Twist"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 1,906
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2010, 8:21 am
District Judge Mary Cooper said in dismissing the suit, Edelman v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 11:08 am
The latest twist in the saga is that the UK government is seeking to overturn the European Court of Human Rights’ ruling in Hirst No. 2. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:57 am
Anticipating criticism of its about-face in the legal arguments underpinning the CPP, the proposed rule notes judicial precedent, including Chevron v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 9:04 am
The Secretary of State will publish the data of each corporation’s employees on its official website within 90 days of receipt of a properly filed annual report. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 6:59 am
State from the 14th Court of Appeals in Houston. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:30 pm
"Congress may not ... 'authorize the issuance of patents whose effects are to remove existent knowledge from the public domain, or to restrict free access to materials already available.''' Bonito Boats, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 1:31 am
If the Bush Administration was the greatest disaster in modern American history, surely Bush v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 5:32 pm
Court of Appeals decision in Padash v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:57 am
Anticipating criticism of its about-face in the legal arguments underpinning the CPP, the proposed rule notes judicial precedent, including Chevron v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 3:16 am
By way of illustration, let’s take a quick look at the recent case of Dangerfield v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 10:32 am
Court of Appeals decision in Padash v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 9:22 am
More importantly, the proposal seemingly favored by the Republicans' opponents -- the contingent interstate compact -- changes NOTHING and may itself be unconstitutional for its effort to devise an end-run around Article V, the obvious way to abolish the Electoral College. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 4:05 am
Andrew’s got no ax to grind that compels him to twist, if not outright fabricate, the holding of the Supreme Court in Rehaif v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 4:36 am
Marco’s response was Brandenburg v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:17 am
See Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 8:29 am
Smith v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 6:38 am
From Van Deelen v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 1:45 am
Supreme Court’s July 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 11:50 am
In City of Austin v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 8:30 am
Nelson v. [read post]
