Search for: "Steve Powers" Results 1361 - 1380 of 4,491
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2011, 6:46 am by Lawrence Cunningham
  Examination stresses the power of ideas and how they are used and cautions creators and users of ideas to take care to appreciate the limits of theory when shaping practice. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 8:54 am by Sam Conforti
  Once again Thomas Trappler has come up with a very informative piece and at a very opportune time (Steve Jobs, Apple’s CEO, just announced its iCloud featuring its state-of-the-art iDataCenter – more on that later in this posting). [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 9:47 am by China Law Blog
Its goal is the opposite; it is intended to protect the CCP and to ensure its hold on power. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 3:58 am by China Law Blog
Its goal is the opposite; it is intended to protect the CCP and to ensure its hold on power. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 8:50 pm by Robert Chesney
  If you are going to be there, put the following on your calendar:  Friday January 4 2:00-5:00 Presidential Program, “Assessing the Future of International Criminal Justice: from Nuremberg to the ICC” (Rosedown, 3rd Floor, Hilton) Saturday January 5  7:00-8:30 Section on Constitutional Law – Breakfast session on presidential power in the Bush and Obama administration, featuring Professors Michael McConnell and Rick Pildes (Grand Salon 3&6, First Floor,… [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 4:58 am by China Law Blog
Its goal is the opposite; it is intended to protect the CCP and to ensure its hold on power. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:00 am by Glenn Reynolds
The latter include such prominent constitutional law scholars as Richard Epstein, Steve Calabresi, Steve Presser, and Gary Lawson.” UPDATE: Reader Michael Formica writes: Is it really the case, as the Atlantic claims, that Volokh actually changed perceptions? [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 3:00 am by Larry Bodine
STEVE ERICKSON CPA, Steve Erickson LLC DAVID WOLFSKEHL, Founder, The Micro Niche Method ALAN VITBERG - President, VITBERG LLC ROBERT FLIGEL, RF Resources Inc. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Steve Kerr might say that Bob has to forgo the extra $2,000 and sell the car to Jane, because he signed on the dotted line with Jane. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 11:00 am by Charlie Dunlap
[Laughter] Steve also seemed to cast the military judges at Guantanamo as somehow not worthy of “trust:” Vladeck: What’s their track record? [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 7:35 pm by Ernie Svenson
So if you’re too distracted by technology don’t blame Apple, or Steve Jobs. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 7:38 pm
There are powerful people with powerful ideas outside of the classroom and I have made those connections through blogging. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:00 am by Ruth Carter
There was also a rumor that USA Gymnastics President Steve Penny pressured Chellsie announce her retirement. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 5:53 pm by William Baude, guest-blogging
” (For lots of fascinating history demonstrating Congress’s power under the Full Faith and Credit Clause, I recommend Steve Sachs’s Full Faith and Credit in the Early Congress.) [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 9:21 am by Jerome A. Cohen
Only months ago this attack seemed the monopoly of right-wing critics, egged on by the likes of Steve Bannon, who were preparing to mobilize the nation against the perceived growing power of the Beijing regime. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 4:30 am by Alex Potcovaru
In a follow-up story, Harris and his co-authors wrote that Smith used the names of top Trump officials including Steve Bannon and Kellyanne Conway in a recruitment document for the effort. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 4:11 am by Will Newman
When a lawyer says, “with all due respect” to a judge, it similarly suggests that the judge is not likely to agree with what the lawyer has to say.Part of the reason lawyers are so deferential is because judges have the power to hold lawyers in contempt. [read post]
23 May 2008, 7:05 am
It remains puzzling why the California Supreme Court, in its recent same-sex marriage decision, rejected the most formally powerful argument for its result: the argument that denying licenses to same-sex couples is sex discrimination. [read post]