Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 14,810
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Here is the language from Shaffer v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 5:12 pm
The OPQ case provides one possible “way out” of this unsatisfactory state of affairs. [read post]
29 May 2020, 4:00 am
Auth. v Transport Workers' Union of Am., Local 100, AFL-CIO, 6 NY3d 332, the court explained that such an award may not be vacated on the ground that the arbitrator exceeded his or her power unless it violates a strong public policy, is irrational, or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation of the arbitrator's power. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 3:04 am
The article reports the results of a "systematic empirical study of how the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) has applied the immoral-or-scandalous prohibition in practice. [read post]
29 May 2020, 12:00 am
Auth. v Transport Workers' Union of Am., Local 100, AFL-CIO, 6 NY3d 332, the court explained that such an award may not be vacated on the ground that the arbitrator exceeded his or her power unless it violates a strong public policy, is irrational, or clearly exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation of the arbitrator's power. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 4:56 pm
Nevertheless, rulemaking without prior comment has increased across a wide range of agencies, a trend that may be strong enough to persist despite the Supreme Court's 2001 decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 9:44 am
In her concurring opinion in State of Oregon v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 10:09 am
The Federal Trade Commission just submitted to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California its witness list for Day 4 of the FTC v. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 2:57 pm
California Chamber of Commerce, et al. v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Hardwick in Lawrence v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 3:04 am
May 24, 2017) [precedential], which stated that fame under Section 2(d) is not "an all-or-nothing" measure but rather "varies along a spectrum from very strong to very weak. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 2:58 pm
In the controversial Ricci v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 10:06 am
" It rejected the State's contention that Dolby should be overruled and took "this opportunity to renew [its] commitment to strong double jeopardy protections. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
But in a recent ruling, in Sessions v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 4:09 am
Tellabs, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:01 am
Sys. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 9:01 pm
Indeed, it has happened before.In the 1992 case of Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 4:20 am
The decision in Gamblin v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 12:00 pm
Davis v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in YU Pride Alliance v. [read post]
