Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 4,764
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2019, 5:35 pm
The post It’s NUT yours, it’s mine: Kraft Foods v Bega Cheese and the importance of intellectual property due diligence appeared first on The Brand Protection Blog. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm
The LSE Media Policy Project blog has piece by Holly Powell-Jones entitled Online abuse: teenagers might not report it because they often don’t see it as a problem The TGI de Paris ruled on 9 A;pril 2019 that Facebook’s T&Cs on user-generated copyright content were unclear and confusing and were were unfair under the consumer code. [read post]
10 May 2019, 11:37 am
The Godoy opinion won't lay to rest all questions that might arise, though. [read post]
10 May 2019, 9:12 am
So to say flatly “the hashtags don’t serve an identification function” because nearby hashtags like #dentist and #beautifulsmiles don’t identify Strauss’s or Align’s products perhaps underestimates consumers. [read post]
7 May 2019, 6:10 am
He hadn’t. [read post]
6 May 2019, 2:58 pm
As such, Clause 2.1 of the SRR may, in accordance with consumer protection law, be subject to judicial scrutiny. [read post]
6 May 2019, 9:41 am
Both the Supreme Court in the seminal Reno v. [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm
” The Michael Geist blog has a post “Does Canadian Privacy Law Matter if it Can’t be Enforced? [read post]
3 May 2019, 1:43 pm
Look at expected uses v. unexpected uses? [read post]
3 May 2019, 8:32 am
General approach is to assume that law or the market is aimed at the reasonable/average consumer; if you know you’re not normal, you should speak up. [read post]
1 May 2019, 4:17 pm
Drug Enforcement Administration did finally bump CBD from a Schedule I to a Schedule V narcotic (the least harmful of controlled substances). [read post]
1 May 2019, 6:31 am
The outcome isn’t novel—it reaches the same conclusion as the Airbnb v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 10:16 am
More recently, a similar conclusion was reached by the US District Court in BanxCorp v Costco. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:26 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 12:33 pm
Consumer Protection Division v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 3:59 am
The editorial board of The Wall Street Journal asserts that although “[t]he High Court’s four liberals again argued for essentially doing away with arbitration because they believe it is unfair to workers and consumers,” “that policy preference is up to Congress, which has expressly allowed arbitration clauses in contracts. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 2:24 pm
He noted that copyright protection was initially limited, but then the protected works expanded to align more with the works protected in European countries. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 1:00 pm
You want to get patent protection so you have the protection for development. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 5:58 am
The case is Lamps Plus v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 3:57 am
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Richard Pierce explains why “[i]t would be easy to interpret the six-Justice majority opinion in Biestek v. [read post]
