Search for: "TAYLOR v. STATE"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 3,021
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2012, 10:07 pm
Of course, Congress could amend the Federal Arbitration Act or the Supreme Court's membership might change, in which case all bets are off.This case is Marmet Healthcare Center v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:07 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 12:00 am
" * See Matter of City of Watertown v State of N.Y. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
" * See Matter of City of Watertown v State of N.Y. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Courts in New York State have consistently recognized the importance of using progressive discipline.Rulings by the New York State Supreme Court, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, and the Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, suggest an employer’s in assigning severe penalties for certain “first offenses” may not survive judicial review. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
As the Supreme Court held in Heck v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 6:18 am
Ceaser, 304 So.2d 855 (La.App. 4th Cir. 1974); and Taylor v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 1:50 pm
Case Name: KELVIN BOURKE v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 1:30 pm
In 2001, the US Supreme Court handed down Atwater v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 2:11 pm
In Atlantic City Housing Authority v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 4:23 am
Taylor v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 9:00 am
Related blog posts: Illinois Appellate Court Allows Expert Testimony Regarding Different Treatment Plans - Taylor v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 6:00 pm
Davis, 480 So.2d 625, 627 (Fla.1985); see also Webb, 899 So.2d at 346; Taylor Woodrow Homes Fla., Inc. v. 4/46-A Corp., 850 So.2d 536, 542 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); Lopez-Infante v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 3:22 am
Levine’s assumption proved to be incorrect, as the Appellate Division quickly pointed out.Affirming the dismissal of his petition by State Supreme Court William J. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 7:42 am
The Court stated that as described in Conolly v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:48 am
Taylor v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:32 am
The town also adopted procedures requiring (1) “timely notice” of any job-related injuries, (2) a time limit for appealing proposed light duty assignments and (3) a requirement that police officers claiming Section 207-c benefits charge any lost time to accumulated leave credits pending a determination of their eligibility for such benefits.A state Supreme Court justice upheld a PERB ruling that the town’s unilateral adoption of such policies and procedures constituted a… [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 4:00 pm
FEC (07-320), Taylor v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 9:09 pm
It then stated that in Buckeye, “the [U.S. [read post]
21 May 2013, 12:33 pm
Kappos v. [read post]