Search for: "Taking Offense v. California"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 1,481
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2009, 2:15 pm
The Constitution makes him a citizen of the United States by nativity, and a citizen of California by residence. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 1:53 pm
California (AKA “Fuck the Draft”), Gooding v. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 9:30 am
Because the California Supreme Court holds that it's a permissible condition of probation for a DUI offense (!) [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Loss amount was properly calculated to include dollar amounts that she had not yet withdrawn, and her base offense level was properly increased where the physical act of popping small air bubbles on the laminated face of her fake ID constituted production of a counterfeit access device. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Chavez, No. 054679, 055401 Convictions for narcotics conspiracy and possession of a silencer-equipped firearm in furtherance of that conspiracy and imposing consecutive sentences for co-defendant's two offenses are affirmed over claims of error that: 1) the evidence was insufficient to support their conviction; and 2) their sentences were unreasonable U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, December 08, 2008 Carrion v. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 6:55 am
" What this meant was that bringing guns into New York City was an offense of a different calibre than, say, Sherman Oaks, California. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
Stat. section 3126(a)(8), a strict liability offense, is a crime involving moral turpitude because the offense combines a reprehensible act with deliberate conduct. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
California, 370 U.S. 660 (1962). [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 9:59 pm
That far from being an offense on my part, it's an offense on their part, and I can resist it just as I could resist similarly illegal acts of private individuals much less powerful than the government.So I'm torn. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 8:24 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 4:32 am
" The recent Gonzales v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, November 05, 2008 US v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:43 am
A study of the gasoline lines that developed when California ordered Chevron to sell gasoline at a discount estimated that the added costs in time associated with price controls were 116 percent of the monetary savings provided by price controls.[27] In other words, price controls did not allow time to be used most efficiently; because time wasted can never be recovered, price controls result in what is known as market waste. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 3:03 pm
California. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Gomez-Gomez, No. 05-41461 Sentence for illegally reentering the United States is affirmed by the court sitting en banc, where a prior sex offense committed using constructive, i.e. nonphysical, force qualified as a "forcible sex offense" for sentence-enhancement purposes. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 10:42 am
Id.Three years later, he was convicted of several California statutory rape offenses. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 7:33 pm
California is a tinderbox. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 10:09 pm
To my surprise, California was not such a negative outlier in release practices. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 6:01 pm
In Lamden v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Santos, No. 060833 Conviction for murder while engaging in a drug offense is affirmed where: 1) because some drug conspiracies in violation of 21 U.S.C. section 846 are "punishable under" section 841(b)(1)(A), criminal liability under section 848(e)(1)(A) requires no active involvement in drug distribution; 2) the nexus between a murder and a drug offense need not be more than the "substantive connection" described in US v. [read post]
