Search for: "U.S. v. Plant"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 2,669
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2017, 1:20 pm
CNN reports that the U.S. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 10:07 am
In 2014, however, the U.S. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 1:37 pm
See, e.g., Cox v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 7:41 pm
In a federal case I testified in recently (US v Simmons), the defendant's compliance with the Oregon Medical Marijuana Act was material in the case because in the application for search warrant, the DEA agent referenced the Ogden & Cole memos (which describe the U.S. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:31 pm
Campbell, James V. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 10:59 am
U.S. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:15 am
In Gamble v. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 1:04 pm
He said in the most recent case, Grass Valley [2007 U.S. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:39 pm
AK Steel’s coke plant in Ashland, KY was alleged to have violated the plant’s Title V permit and the KY State Implementation Plan. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:39 pm
AK Steel’s coke plant in Ashland, KY was alleged to have violated the plant’s Title V permit and the KY State Implementation Plan. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:39 pm
AK Steel’s coke plant in Ashland, KY was alleged to have violated the plant’s Title V permit and the KY State Implementation Plan. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 6:25 pm
I’ll start with Parker v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 12:46 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 9:55 am
The U.S. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 9:41 am
Adasa Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 1:43 pm
The ruling by U.S. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 7:24 am
Ever since the Supreme Court decided West Virginia v. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
” We are looking for balanced and critical views of major aspects of wine regulation, including oenological practices, legal regime of grape varieties, organic wines, land use, plant variety rights, and environmental issues. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 12:18 am
Parker, 348 U.S. 26 (1954), the case in which the U.S. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 7:44 am
Determining that the DOL presented sufficient evidence of adverse employment actions taken against the employee, the court denied the employer’s motion for summary judgment (Perez v U.S. [read post]
