Search for: "US v. Brown" Results 1361 - 1380 of 7,300
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2011, 3:32 am by Russ Bensing
Brown, the court tackles the common use of the “police investigation” exception to the hearsay rule. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 5:57 am by Howard Friedman
Brown, Annapurna Deborah Waughray, Lalit Khandare & Kenneth Glenn Dau-Schmidt, Bostock v Clayton County Game Changer: US Federal Employment Law Now Covers Caste Discrimination Based on Untouchability, (Forthcoming, New York University Review of Law & Social Change, Vol. 46, 2022).James G. [read post]
28 May 2018, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Schmitt, University of Dayton School of Law, has posted Courts, Backlash, and Social Change: Learning from the History of Prigg v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 3:38 pm by CAFE
 Tamara Sepper – Executive Producer; Jake Kaplan – Editorial Producer; Nat Weiner – Audio ProducerREFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: “Use of the HEROES Act of 2003 to Cancel the Principal Amounts of Student Loans, Slip Opinion, Department of Justice, 8/23/22H.R.1412 - Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students Act of 2003Myra Brown et al v. [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 3:38 pm by CAFE
 Tamara Sepper – Executive Producer; Jake Kaplan – Editorial Producer; Nat Weiner – Audio ProducerREFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: “Use of the HEROES Act of 2003 to Cancel the Principal Amounts of Student Loans, Slip Opinion, Department of Justice, 8/23/22H.R.1412 - Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students Act of 2003Myra Brown et al v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:54 am by INFORRM
’ [57] The Court of Appeal noted that in R v Brown [2011] EWCA Crim 2571 Lord Judge CJ had reached a similar conclusion: ‘[I]t is difficult to see how a criminal act of distribution or circulation of a terrorist publication with the specific intent, or in the frame of mind expressly required as an essential ingredient of this offence to encourage or assist acts of terrorism, can be saved by reference to the principle of freedom of speech, unless that principle is… [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 3:19 am by Andres
Last week the excellent Internet Cases blog reported on an new court case involving Creative Commons licences: GateHouse Media, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 4:45 am
Take note that the Republican National Committee Research gives us a distorted transcript, omitting key words and not using ellipses to show that there were omissions: SEN. [read post]
31 May 2007, 11:51 am
The Supreme Court stopped such private "secondary liability" suits in Central Bank v. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 8:19 am by Patricia Salkin
Here, the testimony at the hearing suggested the purpose of the investigation was to determine whether Shook had violated the land use code and, if so, to bring her back into compliance. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 12:25 pm
Hopkins is often viewed as a precursor of the racial civil rights era represented by Brown v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Ten years after the landmark Supreme Court decision Brown v Board of Education ruled that schools must be racially integrated, the city had done little to advance integration in the schools. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:35 pm by Walter Olson
Alas, my chapter on institutional reform litigation in Schools for Misrule has proved only too relevant to the headlines: In today’s 5-4 Brown v. [read post]