Search for: "US v. George" Results 1361 - 1380 of 6,140
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2015, 8:00 am
I am part of a group of constitutional and property law scholars who have filed an amicus brief in, Horne v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:33 am by Ben
”The relevant case law for commandments 1 to 10 seems to be:        Fylde Microsystems Ltd v Key Radio Systems Ltd [1998] FSR 449         Levy v Rutley (1871) (1871) LR 6 CP         Tate v Thomas [1921] 1 Ch 503       Wiseman v George Weidenfeld & Nicolson Ltd [1985] FSR 525        Fylde Microsystems… [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The recent injunction row, PJS v NGN is in many ways a sequel to the 2011 blockbuster – CTB v NGN and Thomas – set in the Super Injunction Spring, the story of Imogen Thomas, a former Miss Wales who had an affair with the Premier League footballer Ryan Giggs. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 6:47 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Moreover, since June 11, 2009, when the United States made the transition to digital television, anyone using a digital converter box also has access to a V-chip. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:01 am
My article argued that, in my experience as an NGO person debating with US military lawyers about a wide variety of human rights and law of war matters over a couple of decades, the peculiarity of the US military lawyer was a preference to treat such matters not as a matter of moral vision, but of "merely" technical lawyering, apolitical technical legal matters, and negotiation of the the US national security interest. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 12:40 pm
”  The oldest one is RHJ Medical Center, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm by David Kopel
George TuckerTucker’s BlackstoneTucker’s Early Lecture NotesF. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday 21 November 2023, Counsel for the claimants in Lawrence & Ors v Associated Newspapers Ltd (ANL) told the High Court that they intend to ask ministers for permission to use confidential Leveson Inquiry documents in their legal action against the publisher of the Daily Mail. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 2:15 pm by Kent Scheidegger
A divided panel of the Ninth Circuit today decided City of Los Angeles v. [read post]