Search for: "US v. Taylor" Results 1361 - 1380 of 2,463
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2011, 1:33 am
“confidential” within the meaning of Section 75.1(c) is not the equivalent of  “confidential” as that term is used in Article 14 of the Civil Service Law; the Taylor Law. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 5:14 pm by Edward X. Clinton, Jr.
 As the court explained the discovery rule is "'grounded on considerations of basic fairness.'"  Taylor v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 10:24 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch In the trademark case of Great Concepts, LLC v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 6:02 pm
Taylor, 2008 BCSC 1498 (5 days);Stone v. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 6:12 am
On the other hand, Cobb county parent Larry Taylor said: "It's terrorist organizations like the ACLU that are hijacking our country's educational system by imposing their own secular agenda on the rest of us. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:47 pm by Matthew Kolken
 See Matter of Robert BAUTISTA, 25 I&N Dec. 616 (BIA 2011).The BIA used the categorical approach set forth in Taylor v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 6:09 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter for Wednesday, June 20, 2012: Liberia's Taylor to appeal war crimes conviction Luka Magnotta pleads not guilty in body parts case Pakistan court disqualifies prime minster from office Don't call it 'suicide,' says right-to-die advocate Only 55 Percent of 2011 US Law Grads Had Full-Time, Long-Term Legal Jobs, Analysis Shows Copyright bill finally clears Commons Calif. bar: Illegal immigrant deserves… [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 6:31 am
Taylor OH-18 Zack Space (Ney open) PA-04 Jason Altmire v. [read post]
2 Sep 2006, 9:53 pm
" Lastly, the Alabama Court of Criminal appeals in Michael Shannon Taylor v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 8:28 pm
This is captured by the dictionary definition relied on in Taylor in the use of the terms “despised”, “dishonour” or “disgrace”. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:38 am by Amy Howe
Coverage of and commentary on the April 29 argument in Glossip v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 7:27 am
Failed to comply with the ruling of the Court of Appeals in Professional, Clerical and Technical Employees Association v Buffalo Board of Education, 90 NY2d 364.In PCTEA v Buffalo, the Court of Appeals held that no strong public policy prohibits an appointing authority from agreeing through collective negotiations to give promotional preference to certain members on an eligible list where a probationary period precedes their permanent appointment. [read post]