Search for: "United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit" Results 1361 - 1380 of 1,392
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2007, 10:58 am
  My friends cut-and-paste allow a quick summary from the Eighth Circuit's official opinion page:062965P.pdf   05/18/2007  United States  v. [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 8:07 am
United States, 544 U.S. 13 (2005) are finally being ironed out in the Circuits). [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 1:21 pm
Tymkovich of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit as the moderator. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 3:46 am
August 11, 2006): Pursuant to this understanding, both the Supreme Court and the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit have held that an individual is not "in custody" for Miranda purposes simply because the individual is the target of an investigation or a suspect in a crime. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 4:32 am
Tymkovich- United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth CircuitMissed it.11:00 a.m. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 4:47 am
Other circuit courts, such as the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, have ruled, more specifically, that a defendant who knowingly possesses a stolen vehicle has no legitimate expectation of privacy in the vehicle and, therefore, cannot establish standing to contest a search of the vehicle. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 1:04 pm
LEXIS 9 (February 12, 2007): The first approach, espoused by the Fourth, Fifth, and Tenth Circuit Courts, is a bright-line rule looking solely to the rental agreement. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 4:10 am
October 29, 2006): With respect to a defendant attempting to invoke the Fourth Amendment, who was in sole possession and control of a car rented by a third party at the time of search, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit has held that such a defendant does not have standing to challenge search or seizure of the car. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 10:51 pm
United States, 431 U.S. 651 (1977), in which the Supreme Court found that the denial of a pretrial motion to dismiss an indictment on double jeopardy grounds was immediately appealable], it is clear that federal intervention is justified where prospective state prosecutions run afoul of the Double Jeopardy Clause. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 3:34 pm
  According to the Administrative Office of the United States Courts (chart here), the Tenth Circuit ranks fourth among the 11 circuits in the median time to disposition of civil cases. [read post]