Search for: "United States Court of Appeals,ninth Circuit"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 6,434
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2019, 5:56 pm
MARTIN SAN FRANCISCO, December 16 – Today, the United States Supreme Court declined to review City of Boise v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 6:00 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in a recent opinion. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 10:03 pm
" See Section 362(a)(3) of the United States Bankruptcy Code. [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 6:41 pm
” See Section 362(a)(3) of the United States Bankruptcy Code. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 10:24 pm
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, famous for (among other high-profile cases) FTC v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 12:39 pm
As a court, the Ninth Circuit in particular has felt the effects of the recent surge in immigration. [read post]
7 Dec 2019, 8:16 am
FTC will file a request for judicial notice soon--and, by the way, I believe the companies who lodged EU antitrust complaints against Nokia (Daimler, Continental, Valeo, Gemalto, BURY Technologies) should also try to leverage the Korean decision in Brussels.The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will hear FTC v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 2:41 pm
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit lifted preliminary injunctions against some of the Trump administration’s restrictions against immigrants in need of public benefits Thursday. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 12:30 pm
Ninth Circuit: The new rule is perfectly consistent with the law. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 4:20 pm
Facebook Inc, No. 19-15121 (9th Cir. 2019), a negligence, defamation and discrimination case against Facebook – the claimant appealed to the Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 7:41 am
§ 1182(f), which permits the president to bar entry of foreign nationals that would be “detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:16 pm
No 17-35640 Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 12:33 pm
The latter is an issue that two automotive industry bodies have raised in a filing with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.For a list of previous posts on amicus curiae briefs in FTC v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 8:53 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will hear oral argument from appellant Qualcomm and appellee the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in the antitrust matter originating from the Northern District of California on Thursday, February 13, 2020, at 9:30 AM Pacific Time.The court's website does not yet list the circuit judges on the panel. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 7:09 am
This is already the fifth post on some amicus curiae briefs filed with the Ninth Circuit in support of the Federal Trade Commission's answer to Qualcomm's appeal--and it won't be the last with at least a couple of submissions from the automotive industry still in my editorial queue.These are the previous posts on amicus briefs supporting the FTC:40 law and economics professors supporting FTC against Qualcomm's appeal contradict themselves just… [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 11:19 am
But the DOJ Antitrust Division's amicus briefs in this context here are absurd, and that's why I'm glad the industry tells the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit what's truly in the interest of the U.S. economy.For the most part, the four briefs just reinforce the FTC's points and explain the importance of standard-setting and compliance with FRAND licensing commitments (including licenses to chipset… [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to reassess whether Alaska’s $500 statutory limit on individual political campaign contributions violates the First Amendment. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 4:55 am
The Texas Supreme Court then discussed the United States Supreme Court’s decisions in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2019, 10:07 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 9:36 pm
Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California is that the abandonment of a prior profitable and voluntary conduct is key--and in Qualcomm's case the problem is that they didn't really want to grant exhaustive licenses to rival chipset makers and only did so because they relied on an exhaustion theory that the Supreme Court disagreed with in Quanta. [read post]
