Search for: "United States v. Am" Results 1361 - 1380 of 7,078
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2011, 7:26 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
--Court: United States District Court for the District of New HampshireOpinion Date: 2/10/11Cite: ANSYS, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 11:37 am by Bradley R. Hall, E.D. Mich.
 He explained, "While I am satisfied that the record is sufficient to make an assessment as to whether the state court judge unreasonably applied [federal law], I am not satisfied that it is sufficient to reach a conclusion with respect to the merits of King's due process claim." [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 3:50 pm by Larry
United States concerns the tariff classification of various glass and glass and metal decorative items that may or may not be used as candle holders. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 8:04 am
Rell (Involuntary conservatorship; "This case comes before us upon our acceptance of certified questions of law from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit pursuant to General Statutes § 51-199b (d). [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 8:44 pm by Sean Hanover
United States, 627 A.2d 968, 970 (D.C. 1993) (quoting United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:18 pm by Jason Rantanen
” Procedural History: At trial, the jury was instructed to consider liability for all “United States sales,” which included “all kits made, used, offered for sale, sold within the United States or imported in the United States as well as kits made outside the United States where a substantial portion of the components are supplied from the United States. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am by Josh Blackman
The “presumption of regularity” that attaches to all federal officials’ actions, United States v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 5:04 am
Co. of North Am., No. 06-CV-00545, filed February 9, 2006, in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, and certified as a nationwide class action (covering a class that, according to defense attorneys, includes annuity transactions that “overlap those in Negrete”); and Castello v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:30 am by Quinta Jurecic
“The saddest thing,” he told a talk-radio host in November, “is, because I am the president of the United States, I am not supposed to be involved with the Justice Department ... [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 7:46 am by Jason Rantanen
Bush, 553 U.S. 723 (2009) (suspension of writ of habeas corpus unconstitutional); United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 2:00 am by Jacob M. Monty, Monty & Ramirez LLP
Infertility is a rising problem in the United States, according to the U.S. [read post]