Search for: "United States v. Article of Drug" Results 1361 - 1380 of 2,340
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2016, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Meanwhile, the Reporters Without Borders World Press Freedom Index places 23 Council of Europe Countries (which balance freedom press against other rights), including the United Kingdom, above the United States – which is at number 41 on the list (between Slovenia and Burkina Faso). [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 11:25 am
On appeal, T.S. raises the sole issue of whether the trial court erred in denying T.S.'s motion to suppress evidence he claims was obtained in violation of Article I, Section 11 of the Indiana Constitution, and the Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 11:35 am
(b) The occasional rendering of services in this state by a physician if the physician: (I) Is licensed and lawfully practicing medicine in another state or territory of the United States without restrictions or conditions on the physician's license; (II) Does not have any established or regularly used medical staff membership or clinical privileges in this state; (III) Is not party to any contract, agreement, or understanding to provide services… [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm by Thomas Greaney and Samuel R. Miller
The United States is unique among developed nations in relying on case-by-case court decisions to develop its competition policy. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 12:36 am by David Kopel
 In a state v. state case, a state can assert the interests of its nationals. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
The first was United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Beck, et al.
Microsoft Corp., 309 F.3d 193, 202 (4th Cir. 2002) (“allegations must be stated in terms that are neither vague nor conclusory’”); Browning v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 5:54 am
  The Court held that the rights afforded under the state Constitution were more protective of individual freedom from arrest than under the United States Constitution. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Supreme Court’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
" (3)However, some nations such as the United States of America (USA) and the United Kingdom (UK) have at points sought to make methods of execution less liable to bungling or to inflicting gratuitous suffering. [read post]