Search for: "United States v. Judge" Results 1361 - 1380 of 32,271
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2009, 8:35 pm by Paul M. Rashkind
We think it plain from the comments of the sentencing judge that he did apply a presumption of reasonableness to Nelson's Guidelines range. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:30 pm
  Sometimes, judges tell you what they think, and if they have indeed missed something -- which is always possible -- being able to recognize their inquiries for what they are and having the ability to correctly respond to these questions matters.Sometimes dispositively. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 9:02 am by Lyle Denniston
   (The judge’s opinion is a part of the Circuit Court’s ruling in Esmail v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:59 am by Josh Blackman
In that event, it will be the people, and not judges, or state officials, or Congress, who will decide. [read post]
31 May 2011, 2:34 pm by Dwight Sullivan
CAAF has already issued its opinion in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 7:29 am by Immigration Prof
Forrest in a petition for habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:40 am by CivPro Blogger
The opinion begins: We consider in this appeal whether the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Denny Chin, Circuit Judge, sitting by designation)... [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:32 am by Wells Bennett
Judge Pohl’s docketing order, in which he adjusts the calendar in United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 10:01 am
I wanted to offer a few thoughts in response to Doug Berman's post (mentioned by Jonathan below) about Judge Posner's sentencing opinion in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:09 pm
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion in the case of Cunningham v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 3:01 pm
spotted in Judge Merritt's dissent in United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 4:17 pm by constitutional lawblogger
A three-judge panel of the Second Circuit ruled this week in United States v. [read post]