Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 1361 - 1380 of 9,474
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2017, 1:35 pm by Ronald Mann
But since it has no home State in the United States, that means that in that situation, there’s no place for plaintiffs to come together and sue that person, correct? [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 6:52 am
The United States Court of Appeals reversed a district court ruling that ordered cancellation of registrations for the marks LOVELYSKIN and LOVELYSKIN.COM for skin care products and online retail services. [read post]
20 Mar 2021, 5:51 pm by Howard Friedman
United States for how to make sense of a fragmented Supreme Court decision with no single majority opinion. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 12:34 pm
Patentlyo discusses the question if the United States Government counts as "a person who is not the owner of a patent" in case Return Mail Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
Given the high percentage of the market open to Doncaster Pharmaceuticals even where it could not use the REGURIN trade mark, SEP's exclusive use of the REGURIN mark in the UK did not contribute to the artificial partitioning of the markets between Member States for trospium chloride. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 10:37 am by Robert Friedman
  On one side of the split are the Second Circuit and United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on the other. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 7:47 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is our guide to the amici (we’ve highlighted the must-read briefs in red): The United States: Here. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 12:36 pm by John Rubin
The United States Supreme Court held long ago, in the 1902 case of Minder v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 1:01 pm by Unknown
United States (Endangered Species Act; Water Rights)Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
Case date: 21 April 2022 Case number: No. 19-55864 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]