Search for: "United States v. Scott" Results 1361 - 1380 of 2,707
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2011, 6:07 pm by David R. Papke
Normet, 405 U.S. 56, 74 (1972), that no fundamental right to housing exists under the United States Constitution. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 12:02 am
"There is universal agreement in the United States that an individual convicted of a capital crime who is mentally incompetent may not be executed. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
The first two cases, Bostock v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:03 am
United Staffing Alliance, another ERISA case involving a claimed right to medical benefits. ** 06-1505, Meacham v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
United States, 445 U.S. 222, 227 n.8 (1980) (quoting Judge Learned Hand’s statement in Gratz v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 1:49 am
In this guest post, long-time Katfriend Dan Bereskin (Bereskin & Parr LLP) gently chides the United States for its regular criticism of its northern neighbour for failure to take sufficient steps to deal with piracy and counterfeiting. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:22 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Scott v Southern Pacific Mortgages Ltd & Anor, heard 3 – 5 March 2014. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:20 am
The district court denied the State's motion but ruled it would require Grady to establish at trial a proper foundation for the admission of any proffered alternate suspect evidence under the standard articulated in United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:23 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Scott Valente and The Eliv Group, LLCCase number: 14-cv-03974 (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York)Case filed: June 3, 2014Qualifying Judgment/Order: February 17, 2016 3/31/2016 6/29/2016 2016-47 SEC v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:29 am by INFORRM
Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and Council, implemented in the United Kingdom by the Electronic Commerce (EC Directive) Regulations 2002, requires member states to take steps to ensure the free movement of information society services between member states. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:36 am by John Elwood
Wong, 13-1074, and United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 3:28 pm by Mary Whisner
In the infamous ruling, the Supreme Court’s majority opinion said that people of African descent in the United States could not become citizens." [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 7:32 am
Scott, Intergovernmental Organizations as Disseminators, Legitimators, and Disguisers of Hegemonic Policy Preferences: The United States, the International Whaling Commission, and the Introduction of a Moratorium on Commercial WhalingJörn Griebel & Milan Plücken, New Developments Regarding the Rules of Attribution? [read post]
13 May 2011, 7:16 am by Kiera Flynn
  According to Justice Stevens, the president acted “not merely to do justice and avenge Sept. 11,” but instead “to remove an enemy who had been trying every day to attack the United States. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 3:28 pm by Mary Whisner
In the infamous ruling, the Supreme Court’s majority opinion said that people of African descent in the United States could not become citizens. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 9:56 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
FinnCase number: 13-cv-02280 (United States District Court for the District of Nevada)Case filed: December 16, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: September 15, 2014 11/26/2014 02/24/2015 2014-128 SEC v. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am by Dave
In particular, the Court must examine whether the decision-making process leading to measures of interference was fair and such as to afford due respect to the interests safeguarded to the individual by Article 8 (see Buckley v. the United Kingdom, 25 September 1996, § 76, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV; Chapman v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27138/95, § 92, ECHR 2001-I; and Connors, cited above, §§ 83 and 92) 68. [read post]
28 May 2006, 5:00 pm
There also is the United States Coast Guard, which is controlled by the Department of Homeland Security. [read post]