Search for: "United States v. Taylor"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 1,573
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2008, 3:03 pm
United States, 495 U.S. 575 (1990) and extended it to convictions by guilty pleas in Shepard v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 5:35 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit limited recovery to the attorney's cost. 472 F. 3d 1370 (2006). [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 8:47 am
In Microsoft v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
United States, 216 F.R.D. 478, 480 (D. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 12:00 am
Cruise ship employees' employment contracts are "considered as commercial" under Title 9 of the United States Code. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
The United States as intervenor and amicus supports the position of the Holy See with respect to the Holy See's status as a foreign state and the constitutionality of the FSIA. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 10:12 pm
Zywicki of George Mason University School of Law, and Judge Douglas Ginsburg of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit as the moderator. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 4:45 pm
Later chestnuts (like Taylor v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 9:43 pm
In dictum, the Court of Appeal cited a recent SCOTUS case, Taylor v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 12:15 pm
Workers v. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 12:15 pm
In Rochester the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, held that PERB abused its discretion when it decided that the City of Rochester committed an improper employer practice in violation of Civil Service Law §209-a(1)(a) (The Taylor Law) by denying city police officers, who were union members, access to union representation during a criminal investigation interview.The Fourth Department said that "PERB abused its discretion in expanding a public employee's rights to… [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:23 am
United States,540 U.S. 375, 381, 124 S. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 12:05 pm
Legislative intent controls in applying personnel rules providing for the liquidation of sick leave accruals upon separation from serviceCounty of Broome v Badger, 2008 NY Slip Op 08230, decided on October 30, 2008, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentInitially the Broom County Legislature adopted a personnel rule setting out the payment that would be made to administrative employees [i.e., unrepresented personnel within the meaning of the Taylor Law] for unused sick time as… [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 12:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 7:46 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 10:42 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, October 13, 2008 Taylor v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
Court rules that the appointing authority made its appointments consistent with the requirements of Section 61.1 of the Civil Service LawMatter of Cherry v New York State Civ. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 12:25 am
Stores Co. (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 1223 and whether Alvarez was effectively nullified by the United States Supreme Court decision in Taylor v. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 3:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
