Search for: "WOODS v. STATE" Results 1361 - 1380 of 2,722
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2013, 11:30 am by Sheppard Mullin
See also Hart, 717 F.3d at 155 (“‘a Lanham Act false endorsement claim is the federal equivalent of the right of publicity’”, taken from the Tiger Woods right of publicity case, ETW Corp. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am by INFORRM
The Panopticon blog has a post about the decision in W, X, Y and Z v Secretary of State for Health, Secretary of State for the Home Department and British Medical Association [2015] EWCA Civ 1034 concerning the sharing of medical information. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:57 am by Jeff Gamso
United States, 470 U.S. 598, 607–08 (1985) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); see also United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
Div. 1991) (stating that New York law does not recognize a defamation claim where the plaintiff voluntarily republished the alleged defamatory words); Doe v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 8:27 pm by cdw
Since the last edition, Holly Wood was killed by the State of Alabama  and Cal Brown by the State of Washington. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
Cir. 30, 37 (Norfolk Mar. 4, 2004)(investigative reports and photographs); Wood v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 8:32 am by Andrew Hamm
” At the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Jonathan Wood discusses the foundation’s amicus brief in Christie v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:00 am
Reg. 359/09 (Renewable Energy Approvals under Part V.0.1 of the Environmental Protection Act. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
  Making Sense of the Electronic Medical Records with the Audit Trail Hospital Fails to Adequately Monitor Pregnant Mother – $11.5 Million Awarded for Death of Unborn Child and Organ Loss of Mother in Miller v. [read post]
  The DOL has stated that it intended the Final Rule to provide clarity by casting a uniform joint employment standard to avoid disparate interpretations by circuit courts throughout the country. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
The first was United States v. [read post]