Search for: "Walker v. State"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 2,830
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2013, 10:12 am
Kimberlin v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 8:17 am
Miles (see Walker v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 6:49 am
” The circuit judges followed with a ruling two weeks ago in the securities fraud case of United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 9:05 pm
Scott Walker’s Act 10 on public sector union bargaining [Wisconsin State Journal, Milwaukee Business Journal] 1973 SCOTUS case of U.S. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:09 am
Supreme Court’s 1994 opinion in O’Melveny & Myers v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm
Not until counsel has been “repeatedly unconscious through not insubstantial portions” of even capital murder trials will prejudice to the defendant will be presumed (see, Muniz v Smith, 647 F3d 619 [6th Cir 2011]; Burdine v Johnson, 262 F3d 336, 340-41 [5th Cir 2001]; Tippins v Walker, 77 F3d 682, 685 [2nd Cir 1996]). [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 11:14 am
United States v Harper, Department of Revenue of Montana v Kurth Ranch, Cordero v Lalor, and United States v Ursery settled that a sanction in a "civil" or non-criminal proceeding may constitute punishment for double jeopardy purposes. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 7:02 am
In Walker v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 5:20 pm
The case of Perry v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 5:25 am
The court of appeals in Walker v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 3:11 pm
” Jones v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 3:00 pm
In a decision June 26 in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm
This is the first in a multi-part series exploring the legal significance of violent online rhetoric by individuals including the vile Bill Schmalfeldt. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:20 pm
Walker nullifying the measure. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 7:20 am
It does not, the Second Circuit (Cabranes, Walker and Wesley) says. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 2:20 pm
Reversed and remanded.Case Name: JERRY HERLING v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:01 am
Oblasser of Schwartz, Bon, Walker & Studer, LLC; Casper, WY for Appellee Hanks. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 10:50 am
., v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 10:46 am
She sues for false arrest.The case is Stansbury v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
To summarize, the proponents’ request is based on three key assertions: (1) Judge Walker’s order should not, as a matter of federal remedies law, have any effect beyond two couples who sued; (2) Judge Walker’s order does not apply to any defendant any longer; (3) if Judge Walker’s order is understood as being limited in this way, Clerks who ignore Proposition 8 are violating state law. [read post]
