Search for: "Works v. State"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 61,610
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2011, 6:12 pm
The main issue decided by the United States Supreme Court in Turner v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 9:46 am
Exacerbation v. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:28 am
USCIS and Amin v. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 7:00 am
The 101 definition of pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works states that,A Mazer v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 11:13 am
In Ken. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 6:39 am
Casey v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 2:23 pm
Christen v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 1:09 pm
The Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision overruling its long-standing physical presence rule in South Dakota v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 7:20 pm
Guest Post Contributed by Amy Ottaviano,Albany Law School student and research assistant to Vin BonventreFor the past few months, working with Professor B., I have been researching the last three terms of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 9:56 am
Deviating from our usual fare of ocean and land related cases, we wade into a constitutional thicket and report on Dannenberg v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 2:10 pm
The Case of Sandberg v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 8:50 am
The question before the United States Supreme Court was whether, in a regulatory taking case, the “parcel as a whole” concept as described in Penn Central Transportation Company v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 12:40 pm
., v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 10:58 pm
In a recent 3rd Circuit opinion, Rea v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 2:44 am
The case is Commonwealth v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 8:55 am
The end of the article stated that: “this article is automatically written by the Tencent’s robot ‘Dreamwriter’ [following the guidance provided by the Feilin v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 3:20 pm
Simcox v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 9:00 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 6:33 am
Martin v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:43 am
Adopting a standard similar to that expressed by the Sixth Circuit in Staunch v Cont’l Airlines Inc, the court stated that in cases where a plaintiff avers that a relevant compensation agreement, like the CBA, does not accurately reflect all the hours the employee actually worked, the employer has the burden of showing that the employee has not worked the requisite hours. [read post]
