Search for: "***redding v. County Court"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,055
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2015, 4:27 am
The cardinal rule in workers' compensation has always been, control of the medical is control of the case.Those in work comp litigation understand this concept very well, on both sides of the fence.A recent Illinois case is demonstrative.In Bob Red Remodeling Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 4:23 pm
The defendant’s Queens County Criminal Lawyer relied on the case of the People v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 6:04 pm
Smith v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 2:19 pm
Unless your New York Traffic Ticket was issued in New York City, Buffalo and parts of Suffolk County you are entitled as a matter of law to a supporting deposition on all moving violations (including: speeding, red lights, tailgating, unsafe lane change and failure to signal) . [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 6:43 am
In the recent case of Atalla v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 8:00 am
Romil Pityou v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
WHITTLE, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS COUNTY COMMISSIONER, RUFUS WARD, JR., ELMER CATON, JOSEF HAUSLER, IN THEIR CAPACITIES AS COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, AND THE COUNTY OF RED RIVER; from Red River County; 6th district (06-07-00058-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 03-18-08)08-0350STEPHANIE DUKES, ET AL. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 5:25 am
In a personal-injury lawsuit, the Kings County Supreme Court, granted Karash's request for relief in his favor. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 1:54 pm
Supreme Court in Brendlin v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 10:25 am
Peter Chilton v. [read post]
3 May 2015, 9:01 pm
Westchester County Supreme Court Justice John P. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 1:19 pm
All five suits were consolidated in Sangamon County Circuit Court. [read post]
26 May 2020, 1:22 pm
A defendant who disagrees with the jail credit calculated by the trial court should seek relief under the procedures in G.S. 15-196.4 State v. [read post]
18 Aug 2007, 10:49 am
Victoria County, 2007 U.S. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 6:34 pm
PLANET HOME LENDING, LLC, Appellee. 4th District.Public records -- Counties -- Exemptions -- Trade secrets -- Trial court correctly determined, after in camera inspection, that aggregate number of airport pick-ups by transportation service company and sums of money paid by company to county as airport usage fee pursuant to license agreement between company and county did not constitute trade secret information which was exempt from public disclosure. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 10:12 am
(Retired Employees Association of Orange County v. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 7:53 am
In this case, the court ruled that State and County had not properly met the burden placed on them by Section 554.002. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 5:00 am
A cell phone punitive damages decision from back in December of 2015 has been brought to my attention in the form of Paszkowki v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:56 am
The court is not persuaded, for example, that Blanca P. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 5:51 am
Is there any meaningful distinction between legal sufficiency review under Jackson v. [read post]
